+ find_bit_benchmark-align-test_find_next_and_bit-with-others.patch added to -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The patch titled
     Subject: lib/find_bit_benchmark.c: align test_find_next_and_bit with others
has been added to the -mm tree.  Its filename is
     find_bit_benchmark-align-test_find_next_and_bit-with-others.patch

This patch should soon appear at
    http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/find_bit_benchmark-align-test_find_next_and_bit-with-others.patch
and later at
    http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/find_bit_benchmark-align-test_find_next_and_bit-with-others.patch

Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
   a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
   b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
   c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
      reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's

*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***

The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
there every 3-4 working days

------------------------------------------------------
From: Yury Norov <ynorov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: lib/find_bit_benchmark.c: align test_find_next_and_bit with others

Contrary to other tests, test_find_next_and_bit() test uses tab formatting
in output and get_cycles() instead of ktime_get().  get_cycles() is not
supported by some arches, so ktime_get() fits better in generic code.

Fix it and minor style issues, so the output looks like this:

Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap
find_next_bit:                 7142816 ns, 163282 iterations
find_next_zero_bit:            8545712 ns, 164399 iterations
find_last_bit:                 6332032 ns, 163282 iterations
find_first_bit:               20509424 ns,  16606 iterations
find_next_and_bit:             4060016 ns,  73424 iterations

Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap
find_next_bit:                   55984 ns,    656 iterations
find_next_zero_bit:           19197536 ns, 327025 iterations
find_last_bit:                   65088 ns,    656 iterations
find_first_bit:                5923712 ns,    656 iterations
find_next_and_bit:               29088 ns,      1 iterations

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181123174803.10916-1-ynorov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <ynorov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Norov, Yuri" <Yuri.Norov@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Clement Courbet <courbet@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---


--- a/lib/find_bit_benchmark.c~find_bit_benchmark-align-test_find_next_and_bit-with-others
+++ a/lib/find_bit_benchmark.c
@@ -108,14 +108,13 @@ static int __init test_find_next_and_bit
 		const void *bitmap2, unsigned long len)
 {
 	unsigned long i, cnt;
-	cycles_t cycles;
+	ktime_t time;
 
-	cycles = get_cycles();
+	time = ktime_get();
 	for (cnt = i = 0; i < BITMAP_LEN; cnt++)
-		i = find_next_and_bit(bitmap, bitmap2, BITMAP_LEN, i+1);
-	cycles = get_cycles() - cycles;
-	pr_err("find_next_and_bit:\t\t%llu cycles, %ld iterations\n",
-		(u64)cycles, cnt);
+		i = find_next_and_bit(bitmap, bitmap2, BITMAP_LEN, i + 1);
+	time = ktime_get() - time;
+	pr_err("find_next_and_bit:  %18llu ns, %6ld iterations\n", time, cnt);
 
 	return 0;
 }
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from ynorov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx are

find_bit_benchmark-align-test_find_next_and_bit-with-others.patch




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux