[merged] mm-memory_hotplug-check-zone_movable-in-has_unmovable_pages.patch removed from -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The patch titled
     Subject: mm, memory_hotplug: check zone_movable in has_unmovable_pages
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     mm-memory_hotplug-check-zone_movable-in-has_unmovable_pages.patch

This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree

------------------------------------------------------
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: mm, memory_hotplug: check zone_movable in has_unmovable_pages

Page state checks are racy.  Under a heavy memory workload (e.g.  stress
-m 200 -t 2h) it is quite easy to hit a race window when the page is
allocated but its state is not fully populated yet.  A debugging patch to
dump the struct page state shows

: [  476.575516] has_unmovable_pages: pfn:0x10dfec00, found:0x1, count:0x0
: [  476.582103] page:ffffea0437fb0000 count:1 mapcount:1 mapping:ffff880e05239841 index:0x7f26e5000 compound_mapcount: 1
: [  476.592645] flags: 0x5fffffc0090034(uptodate|lru|active|head|swapbacked)

Note that the state has been checked for both PageLRU and PageSwapBacked
already.  Closing this race completely would require some sort of retry
logic.  This can be tricky and error prone (think of potential endless or
long taking loops).

Workaround this problem for movable zones at least.  Such a zone should
only contain movable pages.  15c30bc09085 ("mm, memory_hotplug: make
has_unmovable_pages more robust") has told us that this is not strictly
true though.  Bootmem pages should be marked reserved though so we can
move the original check after the PageReserved check.  Pages from other
zones are still prone to races but we even do not pretend that memory
hotremove works for those so pre-mature failure doesn't hurt that much.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181106095524.14629-1-mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx
Fixes: 15c30bc09085 ("mm, memory_hotplug: make has_unmovable_pages more robust")
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>
Reported-by: Baoquan He <bhe@xxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Baoquan He <bhe@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Baoquan He <bhe@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@xxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 mm/page_alloc.c |    8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

--- a/mm/page_alloc.c~mm-memory_hotplug-check-zone_movable-in-has_unmovable_pages
+++ a/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -7789,6 +7789,14 @@ bool has_unmovable_pages(struct zone *zo
 			goto unmovable;
 
 		/*
+		 * If the zone is movable and we have ruled out all reserved
+		 * pages then it should be reasonably safe to assume the rest
+		 * is movable.
+		 */
+		if (zone_idx(zone) == ZONE_MOVABLE)
+			continue;
+
+		/*
 		 * Hugepages are not in LRU lists, but they're movable.
 		 * We need not scan over tail pages bacause we don't
 		 * handle each tail page individually in migration.
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from mhocko@xxxxxxxx are

mm-print-more-information-about-mapping-in-__dump_page.patch
mm-lower-the-printk-loglevel-for-__dump_page-messages.patch
mm-memory_hotplug-drop-pointless-block-alignment-checks-from-__offline_pages.patch
mm-memory_hotplug-print-reason-for-the-offlining-failure.patch
mm-memory_hotplug-be-more-verbose-for-memory-offline-failures.patch
mm-memory_hotplug-do-not-clear-numa_node-association-after-hot_remove.patch




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux