The patch titled
Subject: fs/proc/util.c: include fs/proc/internal.h for name_to_int()
has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
fs-proc-utilc-include-fs-proc-internalh-for-name_to_int.patch
This patch should soon appear at
http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/fs-proc-utilc-include-fs-proc-internalh-for-name_to_int.patch
and later at
http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/fs-proc-utilc-include-fs-proc-internalh-for-name_to_int.patch
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
there every 3-4 working days
------------------------------------------------------
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: fs/proc/util.c: include fs/proc/internal.h for name_to_int()
name_to_int() is defined in fs/proc/util.c and declared in
fs/proc/internal.h, but the declaration isn't included at the point of the
definition. Include the header to enforce that the definition matches the
declaration.
This addresses a gcc warning when -Wmissing-prototypes is enabled.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181115001833.49371-1-ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/proc/util.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
--- a/fs/proc/util.c~fs-proc-utilc-include-fs-proc-internalh-for-name_to_int
+++ a/fs/proc/util.c
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
#include <linux/dcache.h>
+#include "internal.h"
unsigned name_to_int(const struct qstr *qstr)
{
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx are
userfaultfd-convert-userfaultfd_ctx-refcount-to-refcount_t.patch
fs-proc-utilc-include-fs-proc-internalh-for-name_to_int.patch
