The patch titled Subject: mm, memory_hotplug: be more verbose for memory offline failures has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is mm-memory_hotplug-be-more-verbose-for-memory-offline-failures.patch This patch should soon appear at http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/mm-memory_hotplug-be-more-verbose-for-memory-offline-failures.patch and later at http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/mm-memory_hotplug-be-more-verbose-for-memory-offline-failures.patch Before you just go and hit "reply", please: a) Consider who else should be cc'ed b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's *** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code *** The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated there every 3-4 working days ------------------------------------------------------ From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx> Subject: mm, memory_hotplug: be more verbose for memory offline failures There is only very limited information printed when the memory offlining fails: [ 1984.506184] rac1 kernel: memory offlining [mem 0x82600000000-0x8267fffffff] failed due to signal backoff This tells us that the failure is triggered by the userspace intervention but it doesn't tell us much more about the underlying reason. It might be that the page migration failes repeatedly and the userspace timeout expires and send a signal or it might be some of the earlier steps (isolation, memory notifier) takes too long. If the migration failes then it would be really helpful to see which page that and its state. The same applies to the isolation phase. If we fail to isolate a page from the allocator then knowing the state of the page would be helpful as well. Dump the page state that fails to get isolated or migrated. This will tell us more about the failure and what to focus on during debugging. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181107101830.17405-6-mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Oscar Salvador <OSalvador@xxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- mm/memory_hotplug.c | 12 ++++++++---- mm/page_alloc.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c~mm-memory_hotplug-be-more-verbose-for-memory-offline-failures +++ a/mm/memory_hotplug.c @@ -1388,10 +1388,8 @@ do_migrate_range(unsigned long start_pfn page_is_file_cache(page)); } else { -#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_VM - pr_alert("failed to isolate pfn %lx\n", pfn); + pr_warn("failed to isolate pfn %lx\n", pfn); dump_page(page, "isolation failed"); -#endif put_page(page); /* Because we don't have big zone->lock. we should check this again here. */ @@ -1411,8 +1409,14 @@ do_migrate_range(unsigned long start_pfn /* Allocate a new page from the nearest neighbor node */ ret = migrate_pages(&source, new_node_page, NULL, 0, MIGRATE_SYNC, MR_MEMORY_HOTPLUG); - if (ret) + if (ret) { + list_for_each_entry(page, &source, lru) { + pr_warn("migrating pfn %lx failed ", + page_to_pfn(page), ret); + dump_page(page, NULL); + } putback_movable_pages(&source); + } } out: return ret; --- a/mm/page_alloc.c~mm-memory_hotplug-be-more-verbose-for-memory-offline-failures +++ a/mm/page_alloc.c @@ -7977,6 +7977,7 @@ bool has_unmovable_pages(struct zone *zo return false; unmovable: WARN_ON_ONCE(zone_idx(zone) == ZONE_MOVABLE); + dump_page(pfn_to_page(pfn+iter), "has_unmovable_pages"); return true; } _ Patches currently in -mm which might be from mhocko@xxxxxxxx are mm-memory_hotplug-check-zone_movable-in-has_unmovable_pages.patch mm-print-more-information-about-mapping-in-__dump_page.patch mm-lower-the-printk-loglevel-for-__dump_page-messages.patch mm-memory_hotplug-drop-pointless-block-alignment-checks-from-__offline_pages.patch mm-memory_hotplug-print-reason-for-the-offlining-failure.patch mm-memory_hotplug-be-more-verbose-for-memory-offline-failures.patch