The patch titled Subject: hugetlb: take PMD sharing into account when flushing tlb/caches has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was hugetlb-take-pmd-sharing-into-account-when-flushing-tlb-caches.patch This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree ------------------------------------------------------ From: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@xxxxxxxxxx> Subject: hugetlb: take PMD sharing into account when flushing tlb/caches When fixing an issue with PMD sharing and migration, it was discovered via code inspection that other callers of huge_pmd_unshare potentially have an issue with cache and tlb flushing. Use the routine adjust_range_if_pmd_sharing_possible() to calculate worst case ranges for mmu notifiers. Ensure that this range is flushed if huge_pmd_unshare succeeds and unmaps a PUD_SUZE area. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180823205917.16297-3-mike.kravetz@xxxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@xxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- mm/hugetlb.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) --- a/mm/hugetlb.c~hugetlb-take-pmd-sharing-into-account-when-flushing-tlb-caches +++ a/mm/hugetlb.c @@ -3326,8 +3326,8 @@ void __unmap_hugepage_range(struct mmu_g struct page *page; struct hstate *h = hstate_vma(vma); unsigned long sz = huge_page_size(h); - const unsigned long mmun_start = start; /* For mmu_notifiers */ - const unsigned long mmun_end = end; /* For mmu_notifiers */ + unsigned long mmun_start = start; /* For mmu_notifiers */ + unsigned long mmun_end = end; /* For mmu_notifiers */ WARN_ON(!is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma)); BUG_ON(start & ~huge_page_mask(h)); @@ -3339,6 +3339,11 @@ void __unmap_hugepage_range(struct mmu_g */ tlb_remove_check_page_size_change(tlb, sz); tlb_start_vma(tlb, vma); + + /* + * If sharing possible, alert mmu notifiers of worst case. + */ + adjust_range_if_pmd_sharing_possible(vma, &mmun_start, &mmun_end); mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(mm, mmun_start, mmun_end); address = start; for (; address < end; address += sz) { @@ -3349,6 +3354,10 @@ void __unmap_hugepage_range(struct mmu_g ptl = huge_pte_lock(h, mm, ptep); if (huge_pmd_unshare(mm, &address, ptep)) { spin_unlock(ptl); + /* + * We just unmapped a page of PMDs by clearing a PUD. + * The caller's TLB flush range should cover this area. + */ continue; } @@ -3431,12 +3440,23 @@ void unmap_hugepage_range(struct vm_area { struct mm_struct *mm; struct mmu_gather tlb; + unsigned long tlb_start = start; + unsigned long tlb_end = end; + + /* + * If shared PMDs were possibly used within this vma range, adjust + * start/end for worst case tlb flushing. + * Note that we can not be sure if PMDs are shared until we try to + * unmap pages. However, we want to make sure TLB flushing covers + * the largest possible range. + */ + adjust_range_if_pmd_sharing_possible(vma, &tlb_start, &tlb_end); mm = vma->vm_mm; - tlb_gather_mmu(&tlb, mm, start, end); + tlb_gather_mmu(&tlb, mm, tlb_start, tlb_end); __unmap_hugepage_range(&tlb, vma, start, end, ref_page); - tlb_finish_mmu(&tlb, start, end); + tlb_finish_mmu(&tlb, tlb_start, tlb_end); } /* @@ -4298,11 +4318,21 @@ unsigned long hugetlb_change_protection( pte_t pte; struct hstate *h = hstate_vma(vma); unsigned long pages = 0; + unsigned long f_start = start; + unsigned long f_end = end; + bool shared_pmd = false; + + /* + * In the case of shared PMDs, the area to flush could be beyond + * start/end. Set f_start/f_end to cover the maximum possible + * range if PMD sharing is possible. + */ + adjust_range_if_pmd_sharing_possible(vma, &f_start, &f_end); BUG_ON(address >= end); - flush_cache_range(vma, address, end); + flush_cache_range(vma, f_start, f_end); - mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(mm, start, end); + mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(mm, f_start, f_end); i_mmap_lock_write(vma->vm_file->f_mapping); for (; address < end; address += huge_page_size(h)) { spinlock_t *ptl; @@ -4313,6 +4343,7 @@ unsigned long hugetlb_change_protection( if (huge_pmd_unshare(mm, &address, ptep)) { pages++; spin_unlock(ptl); + shared_pmd = true; continue; } pte = huge_ptep_get(ptep); @@ -4348,9 +4379,13 @@ unsigned long hugetlb_change_protection( * Must flush TLB before releasing i_mmap_rwsem: x86's huge_pmd_unshare * may have cleared our pud entry and done put_page on the page table: * once we release i_mmap_rwsem, another task can do the final put_page - * and that page table be reused and filled with junk. + * and that page table be reused and filled with junk. If we actually + * did unshare a page of pmds, flush the range corresponding to the pud. */ - flush_hugetlb_tlb_range(vma, start, end); + if (shared_pmd) + flush_hugetlb_tlb_range(vma, f_start, f_end); + else + flush_hugetlb_tlb_range(vma, start, end); /* * No need to call mmu_notifier_invalidate_range() we are downgrading * page table protection not changing it to point to a new page. @@ -4358,7 +4393,7 @@ unsigned long hugetlb_change_protection( * See Documentation/vm/mmu_notifier.rst */ i_mmap_unlock_write(vma->vm_file->f_mapping); - mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end(mm, start, end); + mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end(mm, f_start, f_end); return pages << h->order; } _ Patches currently in -mm which might be from mike.kravetz@xxxxxxxxxx are