The patch titled
Subject: checkpatch: add optional static const to blank line declarations test
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
checkpatch-add-optional-static-const-to-blank-line-declarations-test.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
------------------------------------------------------
From: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: checkpatch: add optional static const to blank line declarations test
Using a static const struct definition as part of a series of declarations
produces a false positive "Missing a blank line after declarations" for
code like:
WARNING: Missing a blank line after declarations
#710: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/tidss/tidss_scale_coefs.c:137:
+ int inc;
+ static const struct {
So fix it.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/5905126e70b0ed1781e49265fd5c49c5090d0223.camel@xxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reported-by: Jyri Sarha <jsarha@xxxxxx>
Cc: "Valkeinen, Tomi" <tomi.valkeinen@xxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
scripts/checkpatch.pl | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl~checkpatch-add-optional-static-const-to-blank-line-declarations-test
+++ a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
@@ -3311,7 +3311,7 @@ sub process {
# known declaration macros
$sline =~ /^\+\s+$declaration_macros/ ||
# start of struct or union or enum
- $sline =~ /^\+\s+(?:union|struct|enum|typedef)\b/ ||
+ $sline =~ /^\+\s+(?:static\s+)?(?:const\s+)?(?:union|struct|enum|typedef)\b/ ||
# start or end of block or continuation of declaration
$sline =~ /^\+\s+(?:$|[\{\}\.\#\"\?\:\(\[])/ ||
# bitfield continuation
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from joe@xxxxxxxxxxx are
