The patch titled
Subject: signal: make recalc_sigpending_tsk() return bool
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
signal-make-recalc_sigpending_tsk-return-bool.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
------------------------------------------------------
From: Christian Brauner <christian@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: signal: make recalc_sigpending_tsk() return bool
recalc_sigpending_tsk() already behaves like a boolean function. Let's
actually declare it as such too.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180602103653.18181-12-christian@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <christian@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: James Morris <james.morris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Stephen Smalley <sds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/signal.c | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/signal.c~signal-make-recalc_sigpending_tsk-return-bool
+++ a/kernel/signal.c
@@ -138,20 +138,21 @@ static inline bool has_pending_signals(s
#define PENDING(p,b) has_pending_signals(&(p)->signal, (b))
-static int recalc_sigpending_tsk(struct task_struct *t)
+static bool recalc_sigpending_tsk(struct task_struct *t)
{
if ((t->jobctl & JOBCTL_PENDING_MASK) ||
PENDING(&t->pending, &t->blocked) ||
PENDING(&t->signal->shared_pending, &t->blocked)) {
set_tsk_thread_flag(t, TIF_SIGPENDING);
- return 1;
+ return true;
}
+
/*
* We must never clear the flag in another thread, or in current
* when it's possible the current syscall is returning -ERESTART*.
* So we don't clear it here, and only callers who know they should do.
*/
- return 0;
+ return false;
}
/*
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from christian@xxxxxxxxxx are
