The patch titled
Subject: signal: make sig_handler_ignored() return bool
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
signal-make-sig_handler_ignored-return-bool.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
------------------------------------------------------
From: Christian Brauner <christian@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: signal: make sig_handler_ignored() return bool
sig_handler_ignored() already behaves like a boolean function. Let's
actually declare it as such too.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180602103653.18181-8-christian@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <christian@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: James Morris <james.morris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Stephen Smalley <sds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/signal.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/signal.c~signal-make-sig_handler_ignored-return-bool
+++ a/kernel/signal.c
@@ -65,11 +65,11 @@ static void __user *sig_handler(struct t
return t->sighand->action[sig - 1].sa.sa_handler;
}
-static int sig_handler_ignored(void __user *handler, int sig)
+static inline bool sig_handler_ignored(void __user *handler, int sig)
{
/* Is it explicitly or implicitly ignored? */
return handler == SIG_IGN ||
- (handler == SIG_DFL && sig_kernel_ignore(sig));
+ (handler == SIG_DFL && sig_kernel_ignore(sig));
}
static int sig_task_ignored(struct task_struct *t, int sig, bool force)
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from christian@xxxxxxxxxx are
