[patch 139/167] signal: make sig_handler_ignored() return bool

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Christian Brauner <christian@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: signal: make sig_handler_ignored() return bool

sig_handler_ignored() already behaves like a boolean function.  Let's
actually declare it as such too.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180602103653.18181-8-christian@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <christian@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: James Morris <james.morris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Stephen Smalley <sds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 kernel/signal.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/signal.c~signal-make-sig_handler_ignored-return-bool
+++ a/kernel/signal.c
@@ -65,11 +65,11 @@ static void __user *sig_handler(struct t
 	return t->sighand->action[sig - 1].sa.sa_handler;
 }
 
-static int sig_handler_ignored(void __user *handler, int sig)
+static inline bool sig_handler_ignored(void __user *handler, int sig)
 {
 	/* Is it explicitly or implicitly ignored? */
 	return handler == SIG_IGN ||
-		(handler == SIG_DFL && sig_kernel_ignore(sig));
+	       (handler == SIG_DFL && sig_kernel_ignore(sig));
 }
 
 static int sig_task_ignored(struct task_struct *t, int sig, bool force)
_



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux