The patch titled Subject: fat-add-fitrim-ioctl-for-fat-file-system-fix has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was fat-add-fitrim-ioctl-for-fat-file-system-fix.patch This patch was dropped because it was folded into fat-add-fitrim-ioctl-for-fat-file-system.patch ------------------------------------------------------ From: Wentao Wang <witallwang@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: fat-add-fitrim-ioctl-for-fat-file-system-fix If we keep "trimmed" as an u32, there will be a potential shift wrap. It would be a problem on a larger than 4GB partition with FAT32. Though most tools who call this ioctl would ignore this value, it would be great to fix it. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/87h8l37hub.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Wentao Wang <witallwang@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- fs/fat/fatent.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- a/fs/fat/fatent.c~fat-add-fitrim-ioctl-for-fat-file-system-fix +++ a/fs/fat/fatent.c @@ -705,8 +705,8 @@ int fat_trim_fs(struct inode *inode, str struct msdos_sb_info *sbi = MSDOS_SB(sb); const struct fatent_operations *ops = sbi->fatent_ops; struct fat_entry fatent; - u64 ent_start, ent_end, minlen; - u32 free = 0, trimmed = 0; + u64 ent_start, ent_end, minlen, trimmed = 0; + u32 free = 0; unsigned long reada_blocks, reada_mask, cur_block = 0; int err = 0; _ Patches currently in -mm which might be from witallwang@xxxxxxxxx are fat-add-fitrim-ioctl-for-fat-file-system.patch