The patch titled Subject: mm/swap_slots.c: make swap_slots_cache_mutex and swap_slots_cache_enable_mutex static has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was mm-swap-make-swap_slots_cache_mutex-and-swap_slots_cache_enable_mutex-static.patch This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree ------------------------------------------------------ From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: mm/swap_slots.c: make swap_slots_cache_mutex and swap_slots_cache_enable_mutex static The mutexes swap_slots_cache_mutex and swap_slots_cache_enable_mutex are local to the source and do not need to be in global scope, so make them static. Cleans up sparse warnings: symbol 'swap_slots_cache_mutex' was not declared. Should it be static? symbol 'swap_slots_cache_enable_mutex' was not declared. Should it be static? Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180624182536.4937-1-colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- mm/swap_slots.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- a/mm/swap_slots.c~mm-swap-make-swap_slots_cache_mutex-and-swap_slots_cache_enable_mutex-static +++ a/mm/swap_slots.c @@ -38,9 +38,9 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct swap_slots_ static bool swap_slot_cache_active; bool swap_slot_cache_enabled; static bool swap_slot_cache_initialized; -DEFINE_MUTEX(swap_slots_cache_mutex); +static DEFINE_MUTEX(swap_slots_cache_mutex); /* Serialize swap slots cache enable/disable operations */ -DEFINE_MUTEX(swap_slots_cache_enable_mutex); +static DEFINE_MUTEX(swap_slots_cache_enable_mutex); static void __drain_swap_slots_cache(unsigned int type); static void deactivate_swap_slots_cache(void); _ Patches currently in -mm which might be from colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx are spellingtxt-add-more-spellings-to-spellingtxt.patch lib-make-struct-pointer-foo-static.patch rapidio-remove-redundant-pointer-md.patch