The patch titled
Subject: mm-sparse-optimize-memmap-allocation-during-sparse_init-checkpatch-fixes
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
mm-sparse-optimize-memmap-allocation-during-sparse_init-checkpatch-fixes.patch
This patch was dropped because it was folded into mm-sparse-optimize-memmap-allocation-during-sparse_init.patch
------------------------------------------------------
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: mm-sparse-optimize-memmap-allocation-during-sparse_init-checkpatch-fixes
WARNING: 'numner' may be misspelled - perhaps 'number'?
#159: FILE: mm/sparse.c:591:
+ /* The numner of present sections stored in nr_present_sections
WARNING: Block comments use a trailing */ on a separate line
#167: FILE: mm/sparse.c:599:
+ * correctly. */
WARNING: line over 80 characters
#219: FILE: mm/sparse-vmemmap.c:299:
+ map_map[nr_consumed_maps] = sparse_mem_map_populate(pnum, nodeid, NULL);
total: 0 errors, 3 warnings, 149 lines checked
NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to
mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or --fix-inplace.
./patches/mm-sparse-optimize-memmap-allocation-during-sparse_init.patch has style problems, please review.
NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report
them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.
Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches
Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/sparse-vmemmap.c | 3 ++-
mm/sparse.c | 6 ++++--
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/mm/sparse.c~mm-sparse-optimize-memmap-allocation-during-sparse_init-checkpatch-fixes
+++ a/mm/sparse.c
@@ -588,7 +588,8 @@ void __init sparse_init(void)
sizeof(map_map[0]));
#endif
- /* The numner of present sections stored in nr_present_sections
+ /*
+ * The number of present sections stored in nr_present_sections
* are kept the same since mem sections are marked as present in
* memory_present(). In this for loop, we need check which sections
* failed to allocate memmap or usemap, then clear its
@@ -596,7 +597,8 @@ void __init sparse_init(void)
* increase 'nr_consumed_maps' whether its allocation of memmap
* or usemap failed or not, so that after we handle the i-th
* memory section, can get memmap and usemap of (i+1)-th section
- * correctly. */
+ * correctly.
+ */
for_each_present_section_nr(0, pnum) {
struct mem_section *ms;
--- a/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c~mm-sparse-optimize-memmap-allocation-during-sparse_init-checkpatch-fixes
+++ a/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c
@@ -296,7 +296,8 @@ void __init sparse_mem_maps_populate_nod
if (!present_section_nr(pnum))
continue;
- map_map[nr_consumed_maps] = sparse_mem_map_populate(pnum, nodeid, NULL);
+ map_map[nr_consumed_maps] =
+ sparse_mem_map_populate(pnum, nodeid, NULL);
if (map_map[nr_consumed_maps++])
continue;
pr_err("%s: sparsemem memory map backing failed some memory will not be available\n",
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx are
mm-list_lruc-fold-__list_lru_count_one-into-its-caller.patch
mm-sparse-optimize-memmap-allocation-during-sparse_init.patch
mm-sparse-abstract-sparse-buffer-allocations-fix.patch
mm-sparse-abstract-sparse-buffer-allocations-fix-fix.patch
