The patch titled
Subject: mm, page_alloc: do not break __GFP_THISNODE by zonelist reset
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
mm-page_alloc-do-not-break-__gfp_thisnode-by-zonelist-reset.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
------------------------------------------------------
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>
Subject: mm, page_alloc: do not break __GFP_THISNODE by zonelist reset
In __alloc_pages_slowpath() we reset zonelist and preferred_zoneref for
allocations that can ignore memory policies. The zonelist is obtained
from current CPU's node. This is a problem for __GFP_THISNODE allocations
that want to allocate on a different node, e.g. because the allocating
thread has been migrated to a different CPU.
This has been observed to break SLAB in our 4.4-based kernel, because
there it relies on __GFP_THISNODE working as intended. If a slab page is
put on wrong node's list, then further list manipulations may corrupt the
list because page_to_nid() is used to determine which node's list_lock
should be locked and thus we may take a wrong lock and race.
Current SLAB implementation seems to be immune by luck thanks to commit
511e3a058812 ("mm/slab: make cache_grow() handle the page allocated on
arbitrary node") but there may be others assuming that __GFP_THISNODE
works as promised.
We can fix it by simply removing the zonelist reset completely. There is
actually no reason to reset it, because memory policies and cpusets don't
affect the zonelist choice in the first place. This was different when
commit 183f6371aac2 ("mm: ignore mempolicies when using
ALLOC_NO_WATERMARK") introduced the code, as mempolicies provided their
own restricted zonelists.
We might consider this for 4.17 although I don't know if there's anything
currently broken.
SLAB is currently not affected, but in kernels older than 4.7 that
don't yet have 511e3a058812 ("mm/slab: make cache_grow() handle the
page allocated on arbitrary node") it is. That's at least 4.4 LTS.
Older ones I'll have to check.
So stable backports should be more important, but will have to be
reviewed carefully, as the code went through many changes. BTW I think
that also the ac->preferred_zoneref reset is currently useless if we
don't also reset ac->nodemask from a mempolicy to NULL first (which we
probably should for the OOM victims etc?), but I would leave that for a
separate patch.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180525130853.13915-1-vbabka@xxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>
Fixes: 183f6371aac2 ("mm: ignore mempolicies when using ALLOC_NO_WATERMARK")
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>
Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/page_alloc.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff -puN mm/page_alloc.c~mm-page_alloc-do-not-break-__gfp_thisnode-by-zonelist-reset mm/page_alloc.c
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c~mm-page_alloc-do-not-break-__gfp_thisnode-by-zonelist-reset
+++ a/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -4169,7 +4169,6 @@ retry:
* orientated.
*/
if (!(alloc_flags & ALLOC_CPUSET) || reserve_flags) {
- ac->zonelist = node_zonelist(numa_node_id(), gfp_mask);
ac->preferred_zoneref = first_zones_zonelist(ac->zonelist,
ac->high_zoneidx, ac->nodemask);
}
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from vbabka@xxxxxxx are
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
