The patch titled
Subject: mm/shmem: update file sealing comments and file checking
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
mm-shmem-update-file-sealing-comments-and-file-checking.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
------------------------------------------------------
From: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: mm/shmem: update file sealing comments and file checking
In preparation for memfd code restructure, update comments, definitions
and function names dealing with file sealing to indicate that tmpfs and
hugetlbfs are the supported filesystems. Also, change file pointer checks
in memfd_file_seals_ptr to use defined interfaces instead of directly
referencing file_operation structs.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180415182119.4517-3-mike.kravetz@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Marc-Andr Lureau <marcandre.lureau@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/shmem.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff -puN mm/shmem.c~mm-shmem-update-file-sealing-comments-and-file-checking mm/shmem.c
--- a/mm/shmem.c~mm-shmem-update-file-sealing-comments-and-file-checking
+++ a/mm/shmem.c
@@ -2620,12 +2620,13 @@ static loff_t shmem_file_llseek(struct f
/*
* We need a tag: a new tag would expand every radix_tree_node by 8 bytes,
- * so reuse a tag which we firmly believe is never set or cleared on shmem.
+ * so reuse a tag which we firmly believe is never set or cleared on tmpfs
+ * or hugetlbfs because they are memory only filesystems.
*/
-#define SHMEM_TAG_PINNED PAGECACHE_TAG_TOWRITE
+#define MEMFD_TAG_PINNED PAGECACHE_TAG_TOWRITE
#define LAST_SCAN 4 /* about 150ms max */
-static void shmem_tag_pins(struct address_space *mapping)
+static void memfd_tag_pins(struct address_space *mapping)
{
struct radix_tree_iter iter;
void __rcu **slot;
@@ -2646,7 +2647,7 @@ static void shmem_tag_pins(struct addres
} else if (page_count(page) - page_mapcount(page) > 1) {
xa_lock_irq(&mapping->i_pages);
radix_tree_tag_set(&mapping->i_pages, iter.index,
- SHMEM_TAG_PINNED);
+ MEMFD_TAG_PINNED);
xa_unlock_irq(&mapping->i_pages);
}
@@ -2667,7 +2668,7 @@ static void shmem_tag_pins(struct addres
* The caller must guarantee that no new user will acquire writable references
* to those pages to avoid races.
*/
-static int shmem_wait_for_pins(struct address_space *mapping)
+static int memfd_wait_for_pins(struct address_space *mapping)
{
struct radix_tree_iter iter;
void __rcu **slot;
@@ -2675,11 +2676,11 @@ static int shmem_wait_for_pins(struct ad
struct page *page;
int error, scan;
- shmem_tag_pins(mapping);
+ memfd_tag_pins(mapping);
error = 0;
for (scan = 0; scan <= LAST_SCAN; scan++) {
- if (!radix_tree_tagged(&mapping->i_pages, SHMEM_TAG_PINNED))
+ if (!radix_tree_tagged(&mapping->i_pages, MEMFD_TAG_PINNED))
break;
if (!scan)
@@ -2690,7 +2691,7 @@ static int shmem_wait_for_pins(struct ad
start = 0;
rcu_read_lock();
radix_tree_for_each_tagged(slot, &mapping->i_pages, &iter,
- start, SHMEM_TAG_PINNED) {
+ start, MEMFD_TAG_PINNED) {
page = radix_tree_deref_slot(slot);
if (radix_tree_exception(page)) {
@@ -2717,7 +2718,7 @@ static int shmem_wait_for_pins(struct ad
xa_lock_irq(&mapping->i_pages);
radix_tree_tag_clear(&mapping->i_pages,
- iter.index, SHMEM_TAG_PINNED);
+ iter.index, MEMFD_TAG_PINNED);
xa_unlock_irq(&mapping->i_pages);
continue_resched:
if (need_resched()) {
@@ -2733,11 +2734,11 @@ continue_resched:
static unsigned int *memfd_file_seals_ptr(struct file *file)
{
- if (file->f_op == &shmem_file_operations)
+ if (shmem_file(file))
return &SHMEM_I(file_inode(file))->seals;
#ifdef CONFIG_HUGETLBFS
- if (file->f_op == &hugetlbfs_file_operations)
+ if (is_file_hugepages(file))
return &HUGETLBFS_I(file_inode(file))->seals;
#endif
@@ -2757,16 +2758,17 @@ static int memfd_add_seals(struct file *
/*
* SEALING
- * Sealing allows multiple parties to share a shmem-file but restrict
- * access to a specific subset of file operations. Seals can only be
- * added, but never removed. This way, mutually untrusted parties can
- * share common memory regions with a well-defined policy. A malicious
- * peer can thus never perform unwanted operations on a shared object.
+ * Sealing allows multiple parties to share a tmpfs or hugetlbfs file
+ * but restrict access to a specific subset of file operations. Seals
+ * can only be added, but never removed. This way, mutually untrusted
+ * parties can share common memory regions with a well-defined policy.
+ * A malicious peer can thus never perform unwanted operations on a
+ * shared object.
*
- * Seals are only supported on special shmem-files and always affect
- * the whole underlying inode. Once a seal is set, it may prevent some
- * kinds of access to the file. Currently, the following seals are
- * defined:
+ * Seals are only supported on special tmpfs or hugetlbfs files and
+ * always affect the whole underlying inode. Once a seal is set, it
+ * may prevent some kinds of access to the file. Currently, the
+ * following seals are defined:
* SEAL_SEAL: Prevent further seals from being set on this file
* SEAL_SHRINK: Prevent the file from shrinking
* SEAL_GROW: Prevent the file from growing
@@ -2780,9 +2782,9 @@ static int memfd_add_seals(struct file *
* added.
*
* Semantics of sealing are only defined on volatile files. Only
- * anonymous shmem files support sealing. More importantly, seals are
- * never written to disk. Therefore, there's no plan to support it on
- * other file types.
+ * anonymous tmpfs and hugetlbfs files support sealing. More
+ * importantly, seals are never written to disk. Therefore, there's
+ * no plan to support it on other file types.
*/
if (!(file->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE))
@@ -2808,7 +2810,7 @@ static int memfd_add_seals(struct file *
if (error)
goto unlock;
- error = shmem_wait_for_pins(file->f_mapping);
+ error = memfd_wait_for_pins(file->f_mapping);
if (error) {
mapping_allow_writable(file->f_mapping);
goto unlock;
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from mike.kravetz@xxxxxxxxxx are
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
