+ kcov-ensure-irq-code-sees-a-valid-area.patch added to -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The patch titled
     Subject: kcov: ensure irq code sees a valid area
has been added to the -mm tree.  Its filename is
     kcov-ensure-irq-code-sees-a-valid-area.patch

This patch should soon appear at
    http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/kcov-ensure-irq-code-sees-a-valid-area.patch
and later at
    http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/kcov-ensure-irq-code-sees-a-valid-area.patch

Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
   a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
   b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
   c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
      reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's

*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***

The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
there every 3-4 working days

------------------------------------------------------
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
Subject: kcov: ensure irq code sees a valid area

Patch series "kcov: fix unexpected faults".

These patches fix a few issues where KCOV code could trigger recursive
faults, discovered while debugging a patch enabling KCOV for arch/arm:

* On CONFIG_PREEMPT kernels, there's a small race window where
  __sanitizer_cov_trace_pc() can see a bogus kcov_area.

* Lazy faulting of the vmalloc area can cause mutual recursion between
  fault handling code and __sanitizer_cov_trace_pc().

* During the context switch, switching the mm can cause the kcov_area to
  be transiently unmapped.

These are prerequisites for enabling KCOV on arm, but the issues
themsevles are generic -- we just happen to avoid them by chance rather
than design on x86-64 and arm64.


This patch (of 3):

For kernels built with CONFIG_PREEMPT, some C code may execute before or
after the interrupt handler, while the hardirq count is zero.  In these
cases, in_task() can return true.

A task can be interrupted in the middle of a KCOV_DISABLE ioctl while it
resets the task's kcov data via kcov_task_init().  Instrumented code
executed during this period will call __sanitizer_cov_trace_pc(), and as
in_task() returns true, will inspect t->kcov_mode before trying to write
to t->kcov_area.

In kcov_init_task() we update t->kcov_{mode,area,size} with plain stores,
which may be re-ordered, torn, etc.  Thus __sanitizer_cov_trace_pc() may
see bogus values for any of these fields, and may attempt to write to
memory which is not mapped.

Let's avoid this by using WRITE_ONCE() to set t->kcov_mode, with a
barrier() to ensure this is ordered before we clear t->kov_{area,size}. 
This ensures that any code execute while kcov_init_task() is preempted
will either see valid values for t->kcov_{area,size}, or will see that
t->kcov_mode is KCOV_MODE_DISABLED, and bail out without touching
t->kcov_area.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180504135535.53744-2-mark.rutland@xxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 kernel/kcov.c |    3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff -puN kernel/kcov.c~kcov-ensure-irq-code-sees-a-valid-area kernel/kcov.c
--- a/kernel/kcov.c~kcov-ensure-irq-code-sees-a-valid-area
+++ a/kernel/kcov.c
@@ -241,7 +241,8 @@ static void kcov_put(struct kcov *kcov)
 
 void kcov_task_init(struct task_struct *t)
 {
-	t->kcov_mode = KCOV_MODE_DISABLED;
+	WRITE_ONCE(t->kcov_mode, KCOV_MODE_DISABLED);
+	barrier();
 	t->kcov_size = 0;
 	t->kcov_area = NULL;
 	t->kcov = NULL;
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from mark.rutland@xxxxxxx are

kcov-ensure-irq-code-sees-a-valid-area.patch
kcov-prefault-the-kcov_area.patch
sched-core-kcov-avoid-kcov_area-during-task-switch.patch

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux