The patch titled
Subject: lockdep: fix fs_reclaim annotation
has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
lockdep-fix-fs_reclaim-annotation.patch
This patch should soon appear at
http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/lockdep-fix-fs_reclaim-annotation.patch
and later at
http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/lockdep-fix-fs_reclaim-annotation.patch
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
there every 3-4 working days
------------------------------------------------------
From: Omar Sandoval <osandov@xxxxxx>
Subject: lockdep: fix fs_reclaim annotation
While revisiting my Btrfs swapfile series [1], I introduced a situation in
which reclaim would lock i_rwsem, and even though the swapon() path
clearly made GFP_KERNEL allocations while holding i_rwsem, I got no
complaints from lockdep. It turns out that the rework of the fs_reclaim
annotation was broken: if the current task has PF_MEMALLOC set, we don't
acquire the dummy fs_reclaim lock, but when reclaiming we always check
this _after_ we've just set the PF_MEMALLOC flag. In most cases, we can
fix this by moving the fs_reclaim_{acquire,release}() outside of the
memalloc_noreclaim_{save,restore}(), althought kswapd is slightly
different. After applying this, I got the expected lockdep splats.
1: https://lwn.net/Articles/625412/
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/9f8aa70652a98e98d7c4de0fc96a4addcee13efe.1523778026.git.osandov@xxxxxx
Fixes: d92a8cfcb37e ("locking/lockdep: Rework FS_RECLAIM annotation")
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@xxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/sched/mm.h | 4 ++++
mm/page_alloc.c | 20 +++++++++++++++-----
mm/vmscan.c | 20 +++++++++++++-------
3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff -puN include/linux/sched/mm.h~lockdep-fix-fs_reclaim-annotation include/linux/sched/mm.h
--- a/include/linux/sched/mm.h~lockdep-fix-fs_reclaim-annotation
+++ a/include/linux/sched/mm.h
@@ -163,9 +163,13 @@ static inline gfp_t current_gfp_context(
}
#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
+extern void __fs_reclaim_acquire(void);
+extern void __fs_reclaim_release(void);
extern void fs_reclaim_acquire(gfp_t gfp_mask);
extern void fs_reclaim_release(gfp_t gfp_mask);
#else
+static inline void __fs_reclaim_acquire(void) { }
+static inline void __fs_reclaim_release(void) { }
static inline void fs_reclaim_acquire(gfp_t gfp_mask) { }
static inline void fs_reclaim_release(gfp_t gfp_mask) { }
#endif
diff -puN mm/page_alloc.c~lockdep-fix-fs_reclaim-annotation mm/page_alloc.c
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c~lockdep-fix-fs_reclaim-annotation
+++ a/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -3708,7 +3708,7 @@ should_compact_retry(struct alloc_contex
#endif /* CONFIG_COMPACTION */
#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
-struct lockdep_map __fs_reclaim_map =
+static struct lockdep_map __fs_reclaim_map =
STATIC_LOCKDEP_MAP_INIT("fs_reclaim", &__fs_reclaim_map);
static bool __need_fs_reclaim(gfp_t gfp_mask)
@@ -3733,17 +3733,27 @@ static bool __need_fs_reclaim(gfp_t gfp_
return true;
}
+void __fs_reclaim_acquire(void)
+{
+ lock_map_acquire(&__fs_reclaim_map);
+}
+
+void __fs_reclaim_release(void)
+{
+ lock_map_release(&__fs_reclaim_map);
+}
+
void fs_reclaim_acquire(gfp_t gfp_mask)
{
if (__need_fs_reclaim(gfp_mask))
- lock_map_acquire(&__fs_reclaim_map);
+ __fs_reclaim_acquire();
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fs_reclaim_acquire);
void fs_reclaim_release(gfp_t gfp_mask)
{
if (__need_fs_reclaim(gfp_mask))
- lock_map_release(&__fs_reclaim_map);
+ __fs_reclaim_release();
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fs_reclaim_release);
#endif
@@ -3761,8 +3771,8 @@ __perform_reclaim(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsign
/* We now go into synchronous reclaim */
cpuset_memory_pressure_bump();
- noreclaim_flag = memalloc_noreclaim_save();
fs_reclaim_acquire(gfp_mask);
+ noreclaim_flag = memalloc_noreclaim_save();
reclaim_state.reclaimed_slab = 0;
current->reclaim_state = &reclaim_state;
@@ -3770,8 +3780,8 @@ __perform_reclaim(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsign
ac->nodemask);
current->reclaim_state = NULL;
- fs_reclaim_release(gfp_mask);
memalloc_noreclaim_restore(noreclaim_flag);
+ fs_reclaim_release(gfp_mask);
cond_resched();
diff -puN mm/vmscan.c~lockdep-fix-fs_reclaim-annotation mm/vmscan.c
--- a/mm/vmscan.c~lockdep-fix-fs_reclaim-annotation
+++ a/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -3318,11 +3318,15 @@ static int balance_pgdat(pg_data_t *pgda
.may_unmap = 1,
.may_swap = 1,
};
+
+ __fs_reclaim_acquire();
+
count_vm_event(PAGEOUTRUN);
do {
unsigned long nr_reclaimed = sc.nr_reclaimed;
bool raise_priority = true;
+ bool ret;
sc.reclaim_idx = classzone_idx;
@@ -3395,7 +3399,10 @@ static int balance_pgdat(pg_data_t *pgda
wake_up_all(&pgdat->pfmemalloc_wait);
/* Check if kswapd should be suspending */
- if (try_to_freeze() || kthread_should_stop())
+ __fs_reclaim_release();
+ ret = try_to_freeze();
+ __fs_reclaim_acquire();
+ if (ret || kthread_should_stop())
break;
/*
@@ -3412,6 +3419,7 @@ static int balance_pgdat(pg_data_t *pgda
out:
snapshot_refaults(NULL, pgdat);
+ __fs_reclaim_release();
/*
* Return the order kswapd stopped reclaiming at as
* prepare_kswapd_sleep() takes it into account. If another caller
@@ -3600,9 +3608,7 @@ kswapd_try_sleep:
*/
trace_mm_vmscan_kswapd_wake(pgdat->node_id, classzone_idx,
alloc_order);
- fs_reclaim_acquire(GFP_KERNEL);
reclaim_order = balance_pgdat(pgdat, alloc_order, classzone_idx);
- fs_reclaim_release(GFP_KERNEL);
if (reclaim_order < alloc_order)
goto kswapd_try_sleep;
}
@@ -3684,16 +3690,16 @@ unsigned long shrink_all_memory(unsigned
unsigned long nr_reclaimed;
unsigned int noreclaim_flag;
- noreclaim_flag = memalloc_noreclaim_save();
fs_reclaim_acquire(sc.gfp_mask);
+ noreclaim_flag = memalloc_noreclaim_save();
reclaim_state.reclaimed_slab = 0;
p->reclaim_state = &reclaim_state;
nr_reclaimed = do_try_to_free_pages(zonelist, &sc);
p->reclaim_state = NULL;
- fs_reclaim_release(sc.gfp_mask);
memalloc_noreclaim_restore(noreclaim_flag);
+ fs_reclaim_release(sc.gfp_mask);
return nr_reclaimed;
}
@@ -3870,6 +3876,7 @@ static int __node_reclaim(struct pglist_
};
cond_resched();
+ fs_reclaim_acquire(sc.gfp_mask);
/*
* We need to be able to allocate from the reserves for RECLAIM_UNMAP
* and we also need to be able to write out pages for RECLAIM_WRITE
@@ -3877,7 +3884,6 @@ static int __node_reclaim(struct pglist_
*/
noreclaim_flag = memalloc_noreclaim_save();
p->flags |= PF_SWAPWRITE;
- fs_reclaim_acquire(sc.gfp_mask);
reclaim_state.reclaimed_slab = 0;
p->reclaim_state = &reclaim_state;
@@ -3892,9 +3898,9 @@ static int __node_reclaim(struct pglist_
}
p->reclaim_state = NULL;
- fs_reclaim_release(gfp_mask);
current->flags &= ~PF_SWAPWRITE;
memalloc_noreclaim_restore(noreclaim_flag);
+ fs_reclaim_release(sc.gfp_mask);
return sc.nr_reclaimed >= nr_pages;
}
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from osandov@xxxxxx are
lockdep-fix-fs_reclaim-annotation.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
