The patch titled
Subject: lib/list_debug.c: print unmangled addresses
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
list_debug-print-unmangled-addresses.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
------------------------------------------------------
From: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: lib/list_debug.c: print unmangled addresses
The entire point of printing the pointers in list_debug is to see if
there's any useful information in them (eg poison values, ASCII, etc);
obscuring them to see if they compare equal makes them much less useful.
If an attacker can force this message to be printed, we've already lost.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180401223237.GV13332@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Tobin C. Harding <me@xxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
lib/list_debug.c | 14 +++++++-------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff -puN lib/list_debug.c~list_debug-print-unmangled-addresses lib/list_debug.c
--- a/lib/list_debug.c~list_debug-print-unmangled-addresses
+++ a/lib/list_debug.c
@@ -21,13 +21,13 @@ bool __list_add_valid(struct list_head *
struct list_head *next)
{
if (CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(next->prev != prev,
- "list_add corruption. next->prev should be prev (%p), but was %p. (next=%p).\n",
+ "list_add corruption. next->prev should be prev (%px), but was %px. (next=%px).\n",
prev, next->prev, next) ||
CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(prev->next != next,
- "list_add corruption. prev->next should be next (%p), but was %p. (prev=%p).\n",
+ "list_add corruption. prev->next should be next (%px), but was %px. (prev=%px).\n",
next, prev->next, prev) ||
CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(new == prev || new == next,
- "list_add double add: new=%p, prev=%p, next=%p.\n",
+ "list_add double add: new=%px, prev=%px, next=%px.\n",
new, prev, next))
return false;
@@ -43,16 +43,16 @@ bool __list_del_entry_valid(struct list_
next = entry->next;
if (CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(next == LIST_POISON1,
- "list_del corruption, %p->next is LIST_POISON1 (%p)\n",
+ "list_del corruption, %px->next is LIST_POISON1 (%px)\n",
entry, LIST_POISON1) ||
CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(prev == LIST_POISON2,
- "list_del corruption, %p->prev is LIST_POISON2 (%p)\n",
+ "list_del corruption, %px->prev is LIST_POISON2 (%px)\n",
entry, LIST_POISON2) ||
CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(prev->next != entry,
- "list_del corruption. prev->next should be %p, but was %p\n",
+ "list_del corruption. prev->next should be %px, but was %px\n",
entry, prev->next) ||
CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(next->prev != entry,
- "list_del corruption. next->prev should be %p, but was %p\n",
+ "list_del corruption. next->prev should be %px, but was %px\n",
entry, next->prev))
return false;
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from mawilcox@xxxxxxxxxxxxx are
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
