The patch titled
Subject: ocfs2: clean up dead code in alloc.c
has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
ocfs2-clean-dead-code-up-in-allocc.patch
This patch should soon appear at
http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/ocfs2-clean-dead-code-up-in-allocc.patch
and later at
http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/ocfs2-clean-dead-code-up-in-allocc.patch
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
there every 3-4 working days
------------------------------------------------------
From: Changwei Ge <ge.changwei@xxxxxxx>
Subject: ocfs2: clean up dead code in alloc.c
Some stack variables are no longer used but still assigned. Trim them.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1516105069-12643-1-git-send-email-ge.changwei@xxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Changwei Ge <ge.changwei@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Joseph Qi <jiangqi903@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/ocfs2/alloc.c | 11 ++---------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff -puN fs/ocfs2/alloc.c~ocfs2-clean-dead-code-up-in-allocc fs/ocfs2/alloc.c
--- a/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c~ocfs2-clean-dead-code-up-in-allocc
+++ a/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c
@@ -2598,11 +2598,8 @@ static void ocfs2_unlink_subtree(handle_
int i;
struct buffer_head *root_bh = left_path->p_node[subtree_index].bh;
struct ocfs2_extent_list *root_el = left_path->p_node[subtree_index].el;
- struct ocfs2_extent_list *el;
struct ocfs2_extent_block *eb;
- el = path_leaf_el(left_path);
-
eb = (struct ocfs2_extent_block *)right_path->p_node[subtree_index + 1].bh->b_data;
for(i = 1; i < le16_to_cpu(root_el->l_next_free_rec); i++)
@@ -3938,7 +3935,7 @@ static void ocfs2_adjust_rightmost_recor
struct ocfs2_path *path,
struct ocfs2_extent_rec *insert_rec)
{
- int ret, i, next_free;
+ int i, next_free;
struct buffer_head *bh;
struct ocfs2_extent_list *el;
struct ocfs2_extent_rec *rec;
@@ -3955,7 +3952,6 @@ static void ocfs2_adjust_rightmost_recor
ocfs2_error(ocfs2_metadata_cache_get_super(et->et_ci),
"Owner %llu has a bad extent list\n",
(unsigned long long)ocfs2_metadata_cache_owner(et->et_ci));
- ret = -EIO;
return;
}
@@ -5057,7 +5053,6 @@ int ocfs2_split_extent(handle_t *handle,
struct buffer_head *last_eb_bh = NULL;
struct ocfs2_extent_rec *rec = &el->l_recs[split_index];
struct ocfs2_merge_ctxt ctxt;
- struct ocfs2_extent_list *rightmost_el;
if (le32_to_cpu(rec->e_cpos) > le32_to_cpu(split_rec->e_cpos) ||
((le32_to_cpu(rec->e_cpos) + le16_to_cpu(rec->e_leaf_clusters)) <
@@ -5093,9 +5088,7 @@ int ocfs2_split_extent(handle_t *handle,
}
eb = (struct ocfs2_extent_block *) last_eb_bh->b_data;
- rightmost_el = &eb->h_list;
- } else
- rightmost_el = path_root_el(path);
+ }
if (rec->e_cpos == split_rec->e_cpos &&
rec->e_leaf_clusters == split_rec->e_leaf_clusters)
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from ge.changwei@xxxxxxx are
ocfs2-dlm-clean-dead-code-up.patch
ocfs2-cluster-neaten-a-member-of-o2net_msg_handler.patch
ocfs2-clean-dead-code-in-suballocc.patch
ocfs2-clean-dead-code-up-in-allocc.patch
ocfs2-make-metadata-estimation-accurate-and-clear.patch
ocfs2-try-to-reuse-extent-block-in-dealloc-without-meta_alloc.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
