[merged] userfaultfd-clear-the-vma-vm_userfaultfd_ctx-if-uffd_event_fork-fails.patch removed from -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The patch titled
     Subject: userfaultfd: clear the vma->vm_userfaultfd_ctx if UFFD_EVENT_FORK fails
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     userfaultfd-clear-the-vma-vm_userfaultfd_ctx-if-uffd_event_fork-fails.patch

This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree

------------------------------------------------------
From: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: userfaultfd: clear the vma->vm_userfaultfd_ctx if UFFD_EVENT_FORK fails

The previous fix 384632e67e0829 ("userfaultfd: non-cooperative: fix fork
use after free") corrected the refcounting in case of UFFD_EVENT_FORK
failure for the fork userfault paths.  That still didn't clear the
vma->vm_userfaultfd_ctx of the vmas that were set to point to the aborted
new uffd ctx earlier in dup_userfaultfd.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171223002505.593-2-aarcange@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 fs/userfaultfd.c |   20 ++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff -puN fs/userfaultfd.c~userfaultfd-clear-the-vma-vm_userfaultfd_ctx-if-uffd_event_fork-fails fs/userfaultfd.c
--- a/fs/userfaultfd.c~userfaultfd-clear-the-vma-vm_userfaultfd_ctx-if-uffd_event_fork-fails
+++ a/fs/userfaultfd.c
@@ -570,11 +570,14 @@ out:
 static void userfaultfd_event_wait_completion(struct userfaultfd_ctx *ctx,
 					      struct userfaultfd_wait_queue *ewq)
 {
+	struct userfaultfd_ctx *release_new_ctx;
+
 	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(current->flags & PF_EXITING))
 		goto out;
 
 	ewq->ctx = ctx;
 	init_waitqueue_entry(&ewq->wq, current);
+	release_new_ctx = NULL;
 
 	spin_lock(&ctx->event_wqh.lock);
 	/*
@@ -601,8 +604,7 @@ static void userfaultfd_event_wait_compl
 				new = (struct userfaultfd_ctx *)
 					(unsigned long)
 					ewq->msg.arg.reserved.reserved1;
-
-				userfaultfd_ctx_put(new);
+				release_new_ctx = new;
 			}
 			break;
 		}
@@ -617,6 +619,20 @@ static void userfaultfd_event_wait_compl
 	__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
 	spin_unlock(&ctx->event_wqh.lock);
 
+	if (release_new_ctx) {
+		struct vm_area_struct *vma;
+		struct mm_struct *mm = release_new_ctx->mm;
+
+		/* the various vma->vm_userfaultfd_ctx still points to it */
+		down_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
+		for (vma = mm->mmap; vma; vma = vma->vm_next)
+			if (vma->vm_userfaultfd_ctx.ctx == release_new_ctx)
+				vma->vm_userfaultfd_ctx = NULL_VM_UFFD_CTX;
+		up_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
+
+		userfaultfd_ctx_put(release_new_ctx);
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * ctx may go away after this if the userfault pseudo fd is
 	 * already released.
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from aarcange@xxxxxxxxxx are


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux