[patch 10/28] mm, hugetlbfs: introduce ->split() to vm_operations_struct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: mm, hugetlbfs: introduce ->split() to vm_operations_struct

Patch series "device-dax: fix unaligned munmap handling"

When device-dax is operating in huge-page mode we want it to behave like
hugetlbfs and fail attempts to split vmas into unaligned ranges.  It would
be messy to teach the munmap path about device-dax alignment constraints
in the same (hstate) way that hugetlbfs communicates this constraint. 
Instead, these patches introduce a new ->split() vm operation.


This patch (of 2):

The device-dax interface has similar constraints as hugetlbfs in that it
requires the munmap path to unmap in huge page aligned units.  Rather than
add more custom vma handling code in __split_vma() introduce a new vm
operation to perform this vma specific check.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/151130418135.4029.6783191281930729710.stgit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fixes: dee410792419 ("/dev/dax, core: file operations and dax-mmap")
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 include/linux/mm.h |    1 +
 mm/hugetlb.c       |    8 ++++++++
 mm/mmap.c          |    8 +++++---
 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff -puN include/linux/mm.h~mm-hugetlbfs-introduce-split-to-vm_operations_struct include/linux/mm.h
--- a/include/linux/mm.h~mm-hugetlbfs-introduce-split-to-vm_operations_struct
+++ a/include/linux/mm.h
@@ -377,6 +377,7 @@ enum page_entry_size {
 struct vm_operations_struct {
 	void (*open)(struct vm_area_struct * area);
 	void (*close)(struct vm_area_struct * area);
+	int (*split)(struct vm_area_struct * area, unsigned long addr);
 	int (*mremap)(struct vm_area_struct * area);
 	int (*fault)(struct vm_fault *vmf);
 	int (*huge_fault)(struct vm_fault *vmf, enum page_entry_size pe_size);
diff -puN mm/hugetlb.c~mm-hugetlbfs-introduce-split-to-vm_operations_struct mm/hugetlb.c
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c~mm-hugetlbfs-introduce-split-to-vm_operations_struct
+++ a/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -3125,6 +3125,13 @@ static void hugetlb_vm_op_close(struct v
 	}
 }
 
+static int hugetlb_vm_op_split(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr)
+{
+	if (addr & ~(huge_page_mask(hstate_vma(vma))))
+		return -EINVAL;
+	return 0;
+}
+
 /*
  * We cannot handle pagefaults against hugetlb pages at all.  They cause
  * handle_mm_fault() to try to instantiate regular-sized pages in the
@@ -3141,6 +3148,7 @@ const struct vm_operations_struct hugetl
 	.fault = hugetlb_vm_op_fault,
 	.open = hugetlb_vm_op_open,
 	.close = hugetlb_vm_op_close,
+	.split = hugetlb_vm_op_split,
 };
 
 static pte_t make_huge_pte(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct page *page,
diff -puN mm/mmap.c~mm-hugetlbfs-introduce-split-to-vm_operations_struct mm/mmap.c
--- a/mm/mmap.c~mm-hugetlbfs-introduce-split-to-vm_operations_struct
+++ a/mm/mmap.c
@@ -2555,9 +2555,11 @@ int __split_vma(struct mm_struct *mm, st
 	struct vm_area_struct *new;
 	int err;
 
-	if (is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma) && (addr &
-					~(huge_page_mask(hstate_vma(vma)))))
-		return -EINVAL;
+	if (vma->vm_ops && vma->vm_ops->split) {
+		err = vma->vm_ops->split(vma, addr);
+		if (err)
+			return err;
+	}
 
 	new = kmem_cache_alloc(vm_area_cachep, GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!new)
_
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux