The patch titled
Subject: include/linux/bitfield.h: include <linux/build_bug.h> instead of <linux/bug.h>
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
bitfieldh-include-linux-build_bugh-instead-of-linux-bugh.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
------------------------------------------------------
From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: include/linux/bitfield.h: include <linux/build_bug.h> instead of <linux/bug.h>
Since bc6245e5efd7 ("bug: split BUILD_BUG stuff out into
<linux/build_bug.h>"), #include <linux/build_bug.h> is better to pull
minimal headers needed for BUILG_BUG() family.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1505700775-19826-1-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Dinan Gunawardena <dinan.gunawardena@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ian Abbott <abbotti@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/bitfield.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff -puN include/linux/bitfield.h~bitfieldh-include-linux-build_bugh-instead-of-linux-bugh include/linux/bitfield.h
--- a/include/linux/bitfield.h~bitfieldh-include-linux-build_bugh-instead-of-linux-bugh
+++ a/include/linux/bitfield.h
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
#ifndef _LINUX_BITFIELD_H
#define _LINUX_BITFIELD_H
-#include <linux/bug.h>
+#include <linux/build_bug.h>
/*
* Bitfield access macros
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx are
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
