The patch titled
Subject: ocfs2: fstrim: Fix start offset of first cluster group during fstrim
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
ocfs2-fstrim-fix-start-offset-of-first-cluster-group-during-fstrim.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
------------------------------------------------------
From: Ashish Samant <ashish.samant@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: ocfs2: fstrim: Fix start offset of first cluster group during fstrim
The first cluster group descriptor is not stored at the start of the group
but at an offset from the start. We need to take this into account while
doing fstrim on the first cluster group. Otherwise we will wrongly start
fstrim a few blocks after the desired start block and the range can cross
over into the next cluster group and zero out the group descriptor there.
This can cause filesytem corruption that cannot be fixed by fsck.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1507835579-7308-1-git-send-email-ashish.samant@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Ashish Samant <ashish.samant@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi <jiangqi903@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/ocfs2/alloc.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff -puN fs/ocfs2/alloc.c~ocfs2-fstrim-fix-start-offset-of-first-cluster-group-during-fstrim fs/ocfs2/alloc.c
--- a/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c~ocfs2-fstrim-fix-start-offset-of-first-cluster-group-during-fstrim
+++ a/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c
@@ -7304,13 +7304,24 @@ out:
static int ocfs2_trim_extent(struct super_block *sb,
struct ocfs2_group_desc *gd,
- u32 start, u32 count)
+ u64 group, u32 start, u32 count)
{
u64 discard, bcount;
+ struct ocfs2_super *osb = OCFS2_SB(sb);
bcount = ocfs2_clusters_to_blocks(sb, count);
- discard = le64_to_cpu(gd->bg_blkno) +
- ocfs2_clusters_to_blocks(sb, start);
+ discard = ocfs2_clusters_to_blocks(sb, start);
+
+ /*
+ * For the first cluster group, the gd->bg_blkno is not at the start
+ * of the group, but at an offset from the start. If we add it while
+ * calculating discard for first group, we will wrongly start fstrim a
+ * few blocks after the desried start block and the range can cross
+ * over into the next cluster group. So, add it only if this is not
+ * the first cluster group.
+ */
+ if (group != osb->first_cluster_group_blkno)
+ discard += le64_to_cpu(gd->bg_blkno);
trace_ocfs2_trim_extent(sb, (unsigned long long)discard, bcount);
@@ -7318,7 +7329,7 @@ static int ocfs2_trim_extent(struct supe
}
static int ocfs2_trim_group(struct super_block *sb,
- struct ocfs2_group_desc *gd,
+ struct ocfs2_group_desc *gd, u64 group,
u32 start, u32 max, u32 minbits)
{
int ret = 0, count = 0, next;
@@ -7337,7 +7348,7 @@ static int ocfs2_trim_group(struct super
next = ocfs2_find_next_bit(bitmap, max, start);
if ((next - start) >= minbits) {
- ret = ocfs2_trim_extent(sb, gd,
+ ret = ocfs2_trim_extent(sb, gd, group,
start, next - start);
if (ret < 0) {
mlog_errno(ret);
@@ -7435,7 +7446,8 @@ int ocfs2_trim_fs(struct super_block *sb
}
gd = (struct ocfs2_group_desc *)gd_bh->b_data;
- cnt = ocfs2_trim_group(sb, gd, first_bit, last_bit, minlen);
+ cnt = ocfs2_trim_group(sb, gd, group,
+ first_bit, last_bit, minlen);
brelse(gd_bh);
gd_bh = NULL;
if (cnt < 0) {
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from ashish.samant@xxxxxxxxxx are
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
