The patch titled
Subject: mm/list_lru.c: mark expected switch fall-through
has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
mm-list_lru-mark-expected-switch-fall-through.patch
This patch should soon appear at
http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/mm-list_lru-mark-expected-switch-fall-through.patch
and later at
http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/mm-list_lru-mark-expected-switch-fall-through.patch
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
there every 3-4 working days
------------------------------------------------------
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: mm/list_lru.c: mark expected switch fall-through
In preparation for enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171020190754.GA24332@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/list_lru.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff -puN mm/list_lru.c~mm-list_lru-mark-expected-switch-fall-through mm/list_lru.c
--- a/mm/list_lru.c~mm-list_lru-mark-expected-switch-fall-through
+++ a/mm/list_lru.c
@@ -222,6 +222,7 @@ restart:
switch (ret) {
case LRU_REMOVED_RETRY:
assert_spin_locked(&nlru->lock);
+ /* fall through */
case LRU_REMOVED:
isolated++;
nlru->nr_items--;
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from garsilva@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx are
mm-shmem-mark-expected-switch-fall-through.patch
mm-list_lru-mark-expected-switch-fall-through.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
