The patch titled
Subject: locking/rtmutex: replace top-waiter and pi_waiters leftmost caching
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
locking-rtmutex-replace-top-waiter-and-pi_waiters-leftmost-caching.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
------------------------------------------------------
From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: locking/rtmutex: replace top-waiter and pi_waiters leftmost caching
... with the generic rbtree flavor instead. No changes
in semantics whatsoever.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170719014603.19029-10-dave@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@xxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/init_task.h | 5 +---
include/linux/rtmutex.h | 11 ++++-----
include/linux/sched.h | 3 --
kernel/fork.c | 3 --
kernel/locking/rtmutex-debug.c | 2 -
kernel/locking/rtmutex.c | 35 +++++++++---------------------
kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h | 12 +++++-----
7 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
diff -puN include/linux/init_task.h~locking-rtmutex-replace-top-waiter-and-pi_waiters-leftmost-caching include/linux/init_task.h
--- a/include/linux/init_task.h~locking-rtmutex-replace-top-waiter-and-pi_waiters-leftmost-caching
+++ a/include/linux/init_task.h
@@ -175,9 +175,8 @@ extern struct cred init_cred;
#ifdef CONFIG_RT_MUTEXES
# define INIT_RT_MUTEXES(tsk) \
- .pi_waiters = RB_ROOT, \
- .pi_top_task = NULL, \
- .pi_waiters_leftmost = NULL,
+ .pi_waiters = RB_ROOT_CACHED, \
+ .pi_top_task = NULL,
#else
# define INIT_RT_MUTEXES(tsk)
#endif
diff -puN include/linux/rtmutex.h~locking-rtmutex-replace-top-waiter-and-pi_waiters-leftmost-caching include/linux/rtmutex.h
--- a/include/linux/rtmutex.h~locking-rtmutex-replace-top-waiter-and-pi_waiters-leftmost-caching
+++ a/include/linux/rtmutex.h
@@ -22,18 +22,17 @@ extern int max_lock_depth; /* for sysctl
* The rt_mutex structure
*
* @wait_lock: spinlock to protect the structure
- * @waiters: rbtree root to enqueue waiters in priority order
- * @waiters_leftmost: top waiter
+ * @waiters: rbtree root to enqueue waiters in priority order;
+ * caches top-waiter (leftmost node).
* @owner: the mutex owner
*/
struct rt_mutex {
raw_spinlock_t wait_lock;
- struct rb_root waiters;
- struct rb_node *waiters_leftmost;
+ struct rb_root_cached waiters;
struct task_struct *owner;
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES
int save_state;
- const char *name, *file;
+ const char *name, *file;
int line;
void *magic;
#endif
@@ -84,7 +83,7 @@ do { \
#define __RT_MUTEX_INITIALIZER(mutexname) \
{ .wait_lock = __RAW_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(mutexname.wait_lock) \
- , .waiters = RB_ROOT \
+ , .waiters = RB_ROOT_CACHED \
, .owner = NULL \
__DEBUG_RT_MUTEX_INITIALIZER(mutexname) \
__DEP_MAP_RT_MUTEX_INITIALIZER(mutexname)}
diff -puN include/linux/sched.h~locking-rtmutex-replace-top-waiter-and-pi_waiters-leftmost-caching include/linux/sched.h
--- a/include/linux/sched.h~locking-rtmutex-replace-top-waiter-and-pi_waiters-leftmost-caching
+++ a/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -812,8 +812,7 @@ struct task_struct {
#ifdef CONFIG_RT_MUTEXES
/* PI waiters blocked on a rt_mutex held by this task: */
- struct rb_root pi_waiters;
- struct rb_node *pi_waiters_leftmost;
+ struct rb_root_cached pi_waiters;
/* Updated under owner's pi_lock and rq lock */
struct task_struct *pi_top_task;
/* Deadlock detection and priority inheritance handling: */
diff -puN kernel/fork.c~locking-rtmutex-replace-top-waiter-and-pi_waiters-leftmost-caching kernel/fork.c
--- a/kernel/fork.c~locking-rtmutex-replace-top-waiter-and-pi_waiters-leftmost-caching
+++ a/kernel/fork.c
@@ -1462,8 +1462,7 @@ static void rt_mutex_init_task(struct ta
{
raw_spin_lock_init(&p->pi_lock);
#ifdef CONFIG_RT_MUTEXES
- p->pi_waiters = RB_ROOT;
- p->pi_waiters_leftmost = NULL;
+ p->pi_waiters = RB_ROOT_CACHED;
p->pi_top_task = NULL;
p->pi_blocked_on = NULL;
#endif
diff -puN kernel/locking/rtmutex-debug.c~locking-rtmutex-replace-top-waiter-and-pi_waiters-leftmost-caching kernel/locking/rtmutex-debug.c
--- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex-debug.c~locking-rtmutex-replace-top-waiter-and-pi_waiters-leftmost-caching
+++ a/kernel/locking/rtmutex-debug.c
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ static void printk_lock(struct rt_mutex
void rt_mutex_debug_task_free(struct task_struct *task)
{
- DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&task->pi_waiters));
+ DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&task->pi_waiters.rb_root));
DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(task->pi_blocked_on);
}
diff -puN kernel/locking/rtmutex.c~locking-rtmutex-replace-top-waiter-and-pi_waiters-leftmost-caching kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
--- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c~locking-rtmutex-replace-top-waiter-and-pi_waiters-leftmost-caching
+++ a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
@@ -271,10 +271,10 @@ rt_mutex_waiter_equal(struct rt_mutex_wa
static void
rt_mutex_enqueue(struct rt_mutex *lock, struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter)
{
- struct rb_node **link = &lock->waiters.rb_node;
+ struct rb_node **link = &lock->waiters.rb_root.rb_node;
struct rb_node *parent = NULL;
struct rt_mutex_waiter *entry;
- int leftmost = 1;
+ bool leftmost = true;
while (*link) {
parent = *link;
@@ -283,15 +283,12 @@ rt_mutex_enqueue(struct rt_mutex *lock,
link = &parent->rb_left;
} else {
link = &parent->rb_right;
- leftmost = 0;
+ leftmost = false;
}
}
- if (leftmost)
- lock->waiters_leftmost = &waiter->tree_entry;
-
rb_link_node(&waiter->tree_entry, parent, link);
- rb_insert_color(&waiter->tree_entry, &lock->waiters);
+ rb_insert_color_cached(&waiter->tree_entry, &lock->waiters, leftmost);
}
static void
@@ -300,20 +297,17 @@ rt_mutex_dequeue(struct rt_mutex *lock,
if (RB_EMPTY_NODE(&waiter->tree_entry))
return;
- if (lock->waiters_leftmost == &waiter->tree_entry)
- lock->waiters_leftmost = rb_next(&waiter->tree_entry);
-
- rb_erase(&waiter->tree_entry, &lock->waiters);
+ rb_erase_cached(&waiter->tree_entry, &lock->waiters);
RB_CLEAR_NODE(&waiter->tree_entry);
}
static void
rt_mutex_enqueue_pi(struct task_struct *task, struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter)
{
- struct rb_node **link = &task->pi_waiters.rb_node;
+ struct rb_node **link = &task->pi_waiters.rb_root.rb_node;
struct rb_node *parent = NULL;
struct rt_mutex_waiter *entry;
- int leftmost = 1;
+ bool leftmost = true;
while (*link) {
parent = *link;
@@ -322,15 +316,12 @@ rt_mutex_enqueue_pi(struct task_struct *
link = &parent->rb_left;
} else {
link = &parent->rb_right;
- leftmost = 0;
+ leftmost = false;
}
}
- if (leftmost)
- task->pi_waiters_leftmost = &waiter->pi_tree_entry;
-
rb_link_node(&waiter->pi_tree_entry, parent, link);
- rb_insert_color(&waiter->pi_tree_entry, &task->pi_waiters);
+ rb_insert_color_cached(&waiter->pi_tree_entry, &task->pi_waiters, leftmost);
}
static void
@@ -339,10 +330,7 @@ rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(struct task_struct *
if (RB_EMPTY_NODE(&waiter->pi_tree_entry))
return;
- if (task->pi_waiters_leftmost == &waiter->pi_tree_entry)
- task->pi_waiters_leftmost = rb_next(&waiter->pi_tree_entry);
-
- rb_erase(&waiter->pi_tree_entry, &task->pi_waiters);
+ rb_erase_cached(&waiter->pi_tree_entry, &task->pi_waiters);
RB_CLEAR_NODE(&waiter->pi_tree_entry);
}
@@ -1657,8 +1645,7 @@ void __rt_mutex_init(struct rt_mutex *lo
{
lock->owner = NULL;
raw_spin_lock_init(&lock->wait_lock);
- lock->waiters = RB_ROOT;
- lock->waiters_leftmost = NULL;
+ lock->waiters = RB_ROOT_CACHED;
if (name && key)
debug_rt_mutex_init(lock, name, key);
diff -puN kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h~locking-rtmutex-replace-top-waiter-and-pi_waiters-leftmost-caching kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h
--- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h~locking-rtmutex-replace-top-waiter-and-pi_waiters-leftmost-caching
+++ a/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ struct rt_mutex_waiter {
static inline int rt_mutex_has_waiters(struct rt_mutex *lock)
{
- return !RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&lock->waiters);
+ return !RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&lock->waiters.rb_root);
}
static inline struct rt_mutex_waiter *
@@ -53,8 +53,8 @@ rt_mutex_top_waiter(struct rt_mutex *loc
{
struct rt_mutex_waiter *w;
- w = rb_entry(lock->waiters_leftmost, struct rt_mutex_waiter,
- tree_entry);
+ w = rb_entry(lock->waiters.rb_leftmost,
+ struct rt_mutex_waiter, tree_entry);
BUG_ON(w->lock != lock);
return w;
@@ -62,14 +62,14 @@ rt_mutex_top_waiter(struct rt_mutex *loc
static inline int task_has_pi_waiters(struct task_struct *p)
{
- return !RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&p->pi_waiters);
+ return !RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&p->pi_waiters.rb_root);
}
static inline struct rt_mutex_waiter *
task_top_pi_waiter(struct task_struct *p)
{
- return rb_entry(p->pi_waiters_leftmost, struct rt_mutex_waiter,
- pi_tree_entry);
+ return rb_entry(p->pi_waiters.rb_leftmost,
+ struct rt_mutex_waiter, pi_tree_entry);
}
#else
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from dave@xxxxxxxxxxxx are
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
