[merged] mmpage_alloc-dont-call-__node_reclaim-with-oom_lock-held.patch removed from -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The patch titled
     Subject: mm,page_alloc: don't call __node_reclaim() with oom_lock held.
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     mmpage_alloc-dont-call-__node_reclaim-with-oom_lock-held.patch

This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree

------------------------------------------------------
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: mm,page_alloc: don't call __node_reclaim() with oom_lock held.

We are doing last second memory allocation attempt before calling
out_of_memory().  But since slab shrinker functions might indirectly wait
for other thread's __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM && !__GFP_NORETRY memory
allocations via sleeping locks, calling slab shrinker functions from
node_reclaim() from get_page_from_freelist() with oom_lock held has
possibility of deadlock.  Therefore, make sure that last second memory
allocation attempt does not call slab shrinker functions.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1503577106-9196-1-git-send-email-penguin-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 mm/page_alloc.c |    9 ++++++---
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff -puN mm/page_alloc.c~mmpage_alloc-dont-call-__node_reclaim-with-oom_lock-held mm/page_alloc.c
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c~mmpage_alloc-dont-call-__node_reclaim-with-oom_lock-held
+++ a/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -3291,10 +3291,13 @@ __alloc_pages_may_oom(gfp_t gfp_mask, un
 	/*
 	 * Go through the zonelist yet one more time, keep very high watermark
 	 * here, this is only to catch a parallel oom killing, we must fail if
-	 * we're still under heavy pressure.
+	 * we're still under heavy pressure. But make sure that this reclaim
+	 * attempt shall not depend on __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM && !__GFP_NORETRY
+	 * allocation which will never fail due to oom_lock already held.
 	 */
-	page = get_page_from_freelist(gfp_mask | __GFP_HARDWALL, order,
-					ALLOC_WMARK_HIGH|ALLOC_CPUSET, ac);
+	page = get_page_from_freelist((gfp_mask | __GFP_HARDWALL) &
+				      ~__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM, order,
+				      ALLOC_WMARK_HIGH|ALLOC_CPUSET, ac);
 	if (page)
 		goto out;
 
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from penguin-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx are


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux