[patch 61/96] powerpc: don't fortify prom_init

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Daniel Axtens <dja@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: powerpc: don't fortify prom_init

prom_init is a bit special; in theory it should be able to be linked
separately to the kernel.  To keep this from getting too complex, the
symbols that prom_init.c uses are checked.

Fortification adds symbols, and it gets quite messy as it includes things
like panic().  So just don't fortify prom_init.c for now.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1497903987-21002-6-git-send-email-keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Daniel Axtens <dja@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Daniel Micay <danielmicay@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c |    3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff -puN arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c~powerpc-dont-fortify-prom_init arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c~powerpc-dont-fortify-prom_init
+++ a/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c
@@ -15,6 +15,9 @@
 
 #undef DEBUG_PROM
 
+/* we cannot use FORTIFY as it brings in new symbols */
+#define __NO_FORTIFY
+
 #include <stdarg.h>
 #include <linux/kernel.h>
 #include <linux/string.h>
_
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux