The patch titled
Subject: mm, vmalloc: fix vmalloc users tracking properly
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
mm-vmalloc-fix-vmalloc-users-tracking-properly.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
------------------------------------------------------
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: mm, vmalloc: fix vmalloc users tracking properly
1f5307b1e094 ("mm, vmalloc: properly track vmalloc users") has pulled
asm/pgtable.h include dependency to linux/vmalloc.h and that turned out
to be a bad idea for some architectures. E.g. m68k fails with
In file included from arch/m68k/include/asm/pgtable_mm.h:145:0,
from arch/m68k/include/asm/pgtable.h:4,
from include/linux/vmalloc.h:9,
from arch/m68k/kernel/module.c:9:
arch/m68k/include/asm/mcf_pgtable.h: In function 'nocache_page':
>> arch/m68k/include/asm/mcf_pgtable.h:339:43: error: 'init_mm' undeclared (first use in this function)
#define pgd_offset_k(address) pgd_offset(&init_mm, address)
as spotted by kernel build bot. nios2 fails for other reason
In file included from ./include/asm-generic/io.h:767:0,
from ./arch/nios2/include/asm/io.h:61,
from ./include/linux/io.h:25,
from ./arch/nios2/include/asm/pgtable.h:18,
from ./include/linux/mm.h:70,
from ./include/linux/pid_namespace.h:6,
from ./include/linux/ptrace.h:9,
from ./arch/nios2/include/uapi/asm/elf.h:23,
from ./arch/nios2/include/asm/elf.h:22,
from ./include/linux/elf.h:4,
from ./include/linux/module.h:15,
from init/main.c:16:
./include/linux/vmalloc.h: In function '__vmalloc_node_flags':
./include/linux/vmalloc.h:99:40: error: 'PAGE_KERNEL' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'GFP_KERNEL'?
which is due to the newly added #include <asm/pgtable.h>, which on nios2
includes <linux/io.h> and thus <asm/io.h> and <asm-generic/io.h> which
again includes <linux/vmalloc.h>.
Tweaking that around just turns out a bigger headache than necessary.
This patch reverts 1f5307b1e094 and reimplements the original fix in a
different way. __vmalloc_node_flags can stay static inline which will
cover vmalloc* functions. We only have one external user (kvmalloc_node)
and we can export __vmalloc_node_flags_caller and provide the caller
directly. This is much simpler and it doesn't really need any games with
header files.
[akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx: coding-style fixes]
[mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx: revert old comment]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170509211054.GB16325@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fixes: 1f5307b1e094 ("mm, vmalloc: properly track vmalloc users")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170509153702.GR6481@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: Tobias Klauser <tklauser@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/vmalloc.h | 21 ++++++---------------
mm/util.c | 3 ++-
mm/vmalloc.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++++-
3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff -puN include/linux/vmalloc.h~mm-vmalloc-fix-vmalloc-users-tracking-properly include/linux/vmalloc.h
--- a/include/linux/vmalloc.h~mm-vmalloc-fix-vmalloc-users-tracking-properly
+++ a/include/linux/vmalloc.h
@@ -6,7 +6,6 @@
#include <linux/list.h>
#include <linux/llist.h>
#include <asm/page.h> /* pgprot_t */
-#include <asm/pgtable.h> /* PAGE_KERNEL */
#include <linux/rbtree.h>
struct vm_area_struct; /* vma defining user mapping in mm_types.h */
@@ -83,22 +82,14 @@ extern void *__vmalloc_node_range(unsign
const void *caller);
#ifndef CONFIG_MMU
extern void *__vmalloc_node_flags(unsigned long size, int node, gfp_t flags);
-#else
-extern void *__vmalloc_node(unsigned long size, unsigned long align,
- gfp_t gfp_mask, pgprot_t prot,
- int node, const void *caller);
-
-/*
- * We really want to have this inlined due to caller tracking. This
- * function is used by the highlevel vmalloc apis and so we want to track
- * their callers and inlining will achieve that.
- */
-static inline void *__vmalloc_node_flags(unsigned long size,
- int node, gfp_t flags)
+static inline void *__vmalloc_node_flags_caller(unsigned long size, int node,
+ gfp_t flags, void *caller)
{
- return __vmalloc_node(size, 1, flags, PAGE_KERNEL,
- node, __builtin_return_address(0));
+ return __vmalloc_node_flags(size, node, flags);
}
+#else
+extern void *__vmalloc_node_flags_caller(unsigned long size,
+ int node, gfp_t flags, void *caller);
#endif
extern void vfree(const void *addr);
diff -puN mm/util.c~mm-vmalloc-fix-vmalloc-users-tracking-properly mm/util.c
--- a/mm/util.c~mm-vmalloc-fix-vmalloc-users-tracking-properly
+++ a/mm/util.c
@@ -382,7 +382,8 @@ void *kvmalloc_node(size_t size, gfp_t f
if (ret || size <= PAGE_SIZE)
return ret;
- return __vmalloc_node_flags(size, node, flags);
+ return __vmalloc_node_flags_caller(size, node, flags,
+ __builtin_return_address(0));
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(kvmalloc_node);
diff -puN mm/vmalloc.c~mm-vmalloc-fix-vmalloc-users-tracking-properly mm/vmalloc.c
--- a/mm/vmalloc.c~mm-vmalloc-fix-vmalloc-users-tracking-properly
+++ a/mm/vmalloc.c
@@ -1649,6 +1649,9 @@ void *vmap(struct page **pages, unsigned
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(vmap);
+static void *__vmalloc_node(unsigned long size, unsigned long align,
+ gfp_t gfp_mask, pgprot_t prot,
+ int node, const void *caller);
static void *__vmalloc_area_node(struct vm_struct *area, gfp_t gfp_mask,
pgprot_t prot, int node)
{
@@ -1791,7 +1794,7 @@ fail:
* with mm people.
*
*/
-void *__vmalloc_node(unsigned long size, unsigned long align,
+static void *__vmalloc_node(unsigned long size, unsigned long align,
gfp_t gfp_mask, pgprot_t prot,
int node, const void *caller)
{
@@ -1806,6 +1809,20 @@ void *__vmalloc(unsigned long size, gfp_
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__vmalloc);
+static inline void *__vmalloc_node_flags(unsigned long size,
+ int node, gfp_t flags)
+{
+ return __vmalloc_node(size, 1, flags, PAGE_KERNEL,
+ node, __builtin_return_address(0));
+}
+
+
+void *__vmalloc_node_flags_caller(unsigned long size, int node, gfp_t flags,
+ void *caller)
+{
+ return __vmalloc_node(size, 1, flags, PAGE_KERNEL, node, caller);
+}
+
/**
* vmalloc - allocate virtually contiguous memory
* @size: allocation size
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from mhocko@xxxxxxxx are
mm-remove-return-value-from-init_currently_empty_zone.patch
mm-memory_hotplug-use-node-instead-of-zone-in-can_online_high_movable.patch
mm-drop-page_initialized-check-from-get_nid_for_pfn.patch
mm-memory_hotplug-get-rid-of-is_zone_device_section.patch
mm-memory_hotplug-split-up-register_one_node.patch
mm-memory_hotplug-consider-offline-memblocks-removable.patch
mm-consider-zone-which-is-not-fully-populated-to-have-holes.patch
mm-compaction-skip-over-holes-in-__reset_isolation_suitable.patch
mm-__first_valid_page-skip-over-offline-pages.patch
mm-vmstat-skip-reporting-offline-pages-in-pagetypeinfo.patch
mm-memory_hotplug-do-not-associate-hotadded-memory-to-zones-until-online.patch
mm-memory_hotplug-replace-for_device-by-want_memblock-in-arch_add_memory.patch
mm-memory_hotplug-fix-the-section-mismatch-warning.patch
mm-memory_hotplug-remove-unused-cruft-after-memory-hotplug-rework.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
