The patch titled
Subject: mm-vmalloc-fix-vmalloc-users-tracking-properly-fix
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
mm-vmalloc-fix-vmalloc-users-tracking-properly-fix.patch
This patch was dropped because it was folded into mm-vmalloc-fix-vmalloc-users-tracking-properly.patch
------------------------------------------------------
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: mm-vmalloc-fix-vmalloc-users-tracking-properly-fix
I've noticed that I forgot to revert the comment for the originally
inlined __vmalloc_node_flags which is no longer relevant.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170509211054.GB16325@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/vmalloc.h | 5 -----
1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
diff -puN include/linux/vmalloc.h~mm-vmalloc-fix-vmalloc-users-tracking-properly-fix include/linux/vmalloc.h
--- a/include/linux/vmalloc.h~mm-vmalloc-fix-vmalloc-users-tracking-properly-fix
+++ a/include/linux/vmalloc.h
@@ -87,11 +87,6 @@ static inline void *__vmalloc_node_flags
return __vmalloc_node_flags(size, node, flags);
}
#else
-/*
- * We really want to have this inlined due to caller tracking. This
- * function is used by the highlevel vmalloc apis and so we want to track
- * their callers and inlining will achieve that.
- */
extern void *__vmalloc_node_flags_caller(unsigned long size,
int node, gfp_t flags, void* caller);
#endif
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx are
mm-vmalloc-fix-vmalloc-users-tracking-properly.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
