The patch titled Subject: lib/fault-inject.c: use correct check for interrupts has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was fault-inject-use-correct-check-for-interrupts.patch This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree ------------------------------------------------------ From: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@xxxxxxxxxx> Subject: lib/fault-inject.c: use correct check for interrupts in_interrupt() also returns true when bh is disabled in task context. That's not what fail_task() wants to check. Use the new in_task() predicate that does the right thing. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170321091805.140676-1-dvyukov@xxxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@xxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- lib/fault-inject.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff -puN lib/fault-inject.c~fault-inject-use-correct-check-for-interrupts lib/fault-inject.c --- a/lib/fault-inject.c~fault-inject-use-correct-check-for-interrupts +++ a/lib/fault-inject.c @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ static void fail_dump(struct fault_attr static bool fail_task(struct fault_attr *attr, struct task_struct *task) { - return !in_interrupt() && task->make_it_fail; + return in_task() && task->make_it_fail; } #define MAX_STACK_TRACE_DEPTH 32 _ Patches currently in -mm which might be from dvyukov@xxxxxxxxxx are fault-inject-support-systematic-fault-injection.patch -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html