+ userfaultfd-non-cooperative-robustness-check.patch added to -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The patch titled
     Subject: userfaultfd: non-cooperative: robustness check
has been added to the -mm tree.  Its filename is
     userfaultfd-non-cooperative-robustness-check.patch

This patch should soon appear at
    http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/userfaultfd-non-cooperative-robustness-check.patch
and later at
    http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/userfaultfd-non-cooperative-robustness-check.patch

Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
   a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
   b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
   c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
      reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's

*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***

The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
there every 3-4 working days

------------------------------------------------------
From: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: userfaultfd: non-cooperative: robustness check

Similar to the handle_userfault() case, also make sure to never
attempt to send any event past the PF_EXITING point of no return.

This is purely a robustness check.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170224181957.19736-3-aarcange@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 fs/userfaultfd.c |    9 +++++++--
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff -puN fs/userfaultfd.c~userfaultfd-non-cooperative-robustness-check fs/userfaultfd.c
--- a/fs/userfaultfd.c~userfaultfd-non-cooperative-robustness-check
+++ a/fs/userfaultfd.c
@@ -529,8 +529,13 @@ out:
 static int userfaultfd_event_wait_completion(struct userfaultfd_ctx *ctx,
 					     struct userfaultfd_wait_queue *ewq)
 {
-	int ret = 0;
+	int ret;
 
+	ret = -1;
+	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(current->flags & PF_EXITING))
+		goto out;
+
+	ret = 0;
 	ewq->ctx = ctx;
 	init_waitqueue_entry(&ewq->wq, current);
 
@@ -565,7 +570,7 @@ static int userfaultfd_event_wait_comple
 	 * ctx may go away after this if the userfault pseudo fd is
 	 * already released.
 	 */
-
+out:
 	userfaultfd_ctx_put(ctx);
 	return ret;
 }
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from aarcange@xxxxxxxxxx are

userfaultfd-shmem-__do_fault-requires-vm_fault_nopage.patch
userfaultfd-non-cooperative-rollback-userfaultfd_exit.patch
userfaultfd-non-cooperative-robustness-check.patch
userfaultfd-non-cooperative-release-all-ctx-in-dup_userfaultfd_complete.patch

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux