[merged] mm-memblockc-check-return-value-of-memblock_reserve-in-memblock_virt_alloc_internal.patch removed from -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The patch titled
     Subject: mm/memblock.c: check return value of memblock_reserve() in memblock_virt_alloc_internal()
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     mm-memblockc-check-return-value-of-memblock_reserve-in-memblock_virt_alloc_internal.patch

This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree

------------------------------------------------------
From: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: mm/memblock.c: check return value of memblock_reserve() in memblock_virt_alloc_internal()

memblock_reserve() would add a new range to memblock.reserved in case the
new range is not totally covered by any of the current memblock.reserved
range.  If the memblock.reserved is full and can't resize,
memblock_reserve() would fail.

This doesn't happen in real world now, I observed this during code review.
While theoretically, it has the chance to happen.  And if it happens,
others would think this range of memory is still available and may corrupt
the memory.

This patch checks the return value and goto "done" after it succeeds.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1482363033-24754-3-git-send-email-richard.weiyang@xxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@xxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 mm/memblock.c |    6 ++----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff -puN mm/memblock.c~mm-memblockc-check-return-value-of-memblock_reserve-in-memblock_virt_alloc_internal mm/memblock.c
--- a/mm/memblock.c~mm-memblockc-check-return-value-of-memblock_reserve-in-memblock_virt_alloc_internal
+++ a/mm/memblock.c
@@ -1299,18 +1299,17 @@ static void * __init memblock_virt_alloc
 
 	if (max_addr > memblock.current_limit)
 		max_addr = memblock.current_limit;
-
 again:
 	alloc = memblock_find_in_range_node(size, align, min_addr, max_addr,
 					    nid, flags);
-	if (alloc)
+	if (alloc && !memblock_reserve(alloc, size))
 		goto done;
 
 	if (nid != NUMA_NO_NODE) {
 		alloc = memblock_find_in_range_node(size, align, min_addr,
 						    max_addr, NUMA_NO_NODE,
 						    flags);
-		if (alloc)
+		if (alloc && !memblock_reserve(alloc, size))
 			goto done;
 	}
 
@@ -1328,7 +1327,6 @@ again:
 
 	return NULL;
 done:
-	memblock_reserve(alloc, size);
 	ptr = phys_to_virt(alloc);
 	memset(ptr, 0, size);
 
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from richard.weiyang@xxxxxxxxx are

mm-page_alloc-return-0-in-case-this-node-has-no-page-within-the-zone.patch
mm-page_alloc-remove-redundant-init-code-for-zone_movable.patch

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux