The patch titled Subject: bpf: do not use KMALLOC_SHIFT_MAX has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is bpf-do-not-use-kmalloc_shift_max.patch This patch should soon appear at http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/bpf-do-not-use-kmalloc_shift_max.patch and later at http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/bpf-do-not-use-kmalloc_shift_max.patch Before you just go and hit "reply", please: a) Consider who else should be cc'ed b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code *** The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated there every 3-4 working days ------------------------------------------------------ From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx> Subject: bpf: do not use KMALLOC_SHIFT_MAX 01b3f52157ff ("bpf: fix allocation warnings in bpf maps and integer overflow") has added checks for the maximum allocateable size. It (ab)used KMALLOC_SHIFT_MAX for that purpose. While this is not incorrect it is not very clean because we already have KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE for this very reason so let's change both checks to use KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE instead. The original motivation for using KMALLOC_SHIFT_MAX was to work around an incorrect KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE which could lead to allocation warnings but it is no longer needed since "slab: make sure that KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE will fit into MAX_ORDER". Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161220130659.16461-3-mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- kernel/bpf/arraymap.c | 2 +- kernel/bpf/hashtab.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff -puN kernel/bpf/arraymap.c~bpf-do-not-use-kmalloc_shift_max kernel/bpf/arraymap.c --- a/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c~bpf-do-not-use-kmalloc_shift_max +++ a/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ static struct bpf_map *array_map_alloc(u attr->value_size == 0 || attr->map_flags) return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); - if (attr->value_size >= 1 << (KMALLOC_SHIFT_MAX - 1)) + if (attr->value_size > KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE) /* if value_size is bigger, the user space won't be able to * access the elements. */ diff -puN kernel/bpf/hashtab.c~bpf-do-not-use-kmalloc_shift_max kernel/bpf/hashtab.c --- a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c~bpf-do-not-use-kmalloc_shift_max +++ a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c @@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ static struct bpf_map *htab_map_alloc(un */ goto free_htab; - if (htab->map.value_size >= (1 << (KMALLOC_SHIFT_MAX - 1)) - + if (htab->map.value_size >= KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE - MAX_BPF_STACK - sizeof(struct htab_elem)) /* if value_size is bigger, the user space won't be able to * access the elements via bpf syscall. This check also makes _ Patches currently in -mm which might be from mhocko@xxxxxxxx are mm-slab-make-sure-that-kmalloc_max_size-will-fit-into-max_order.patch bpf-do-not-use-kmalloc_shift_max.patch mm-throttle-show_mem-from-warn_alloc.patch -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html