+ bpf-do-not-use-kmalloc_shift_max.patch added to -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The patch titled
     Subject: bpf: do not use KMALLOC_SHIFT_MAX
has been added to the -mm tree.  Its filename is
     bpf-do-not-use-kmalloc_shift_max.patch

This patch should soon appear at
    http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/bpf-do-not-use-kmalloc_shift_max.patch
and later at
    http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/bpf-do-not-use-kmalloc_shift_max.patch

Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
   a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
   b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
   c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
      reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's

*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***

The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
there every 3-4 working days

------------------------------------------------------
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: bpf: do not use KMALLOC_SHIFT_MAX

01b3f52157ff ("bpf: fix allocation warnings in bpf maps and integer
overflow") has added checks for the maximum allocateable size.  It
(ab)used KMALLOC_SHIFT_MAX for that purpose.  While this is not incorrect
it is not very clean because we already have KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE for this
very reason so let's change both checks to use KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE instead.

The original motivation for using KMALLOC_SHIFT_MAX was to work around an
incorrect KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE which could lead to allocation warnings but it
is no longer needed since "slab: make sure that KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE will fit
into MAX_ORDER".

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161220130659.16461-3-mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 kernel/bpf/arraymap.c |    2 +-
 kernel/bpf/hashtab.c  |    2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff -puN kernel/bpf/arraymap.c~bpf-do-not-use-kmalloc_shift_max kernel/bpf/arraymap.c
--- a/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c~bpf-do-not-use-kmalloc_shift_max
+++ a/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ static struct bpf_map *array_map_alloc(u
 	    attr->value_size == 0 || attr->map_flags)
 		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
 
-	if (attr->value_size >= 1 << (KMALLOC_SHIFT_MAX - 1))
+	if (attr->value_size > KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE)
 		/* if value_size is bigger, the user space won't be able to
 		 * access the elements.
 		 */
diff -puN kernel/bpf/hashtab.c~bpf-do-not-use-kmalloc_shift_max kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
--- a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c~bpf-do-not-use-kmalloc_shift_max
+++ a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
@@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ static struct bpf_map *htab_map_alloc(un
 		 */
 		goto free_htab;
 
-	if (htab->map.value_size >= (1 << (KMALLOC_SHIFT_MAX - 1)) -
+	if (htab->map.value_size >= KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE -
 	    MAX_BPF_STACK - sizeof(struct htab_elem))
 		/* if value_size is bigger, the user space won't be able to
 		 * access the elements via bpf syscall. This check also makes
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from mhocko@xxxxxxxx are

mm-slab-make-sure-that-kmalloc_max_size-will-fit-into-max_order.patch
bpf-do-not-use-kmalloc_shift_max.patch
mm-throttle-show_mem-from-warn_alloc.patch

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux