[patch 6/7] mm, oom: fix uninitialized ret in task_will_free_mem()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: mm, oom: fix uninitialized ret in task_will_free_mem()

    mm/oom_kill.c: In function `task_will_free_mem':
    mm/oom_kill.c:767: warning: `ret' may be used uninitialized in this function

If __task_will_free_mem() is never called inside the for_each_process()
loop, ret will not be initialized.

Fixes: 1af8bb43269563e4 ("mm, oom: fortify task_will_free_mem()")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1470255599-24841-1-git-send-email-geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 mm/oom_kill.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff -puN mm/oom_kill.c~mm-oom-fix-uninitialized-ret-in-task_will_free_mem mm/oom_kill.c
--- a/mm/oom_kill.c~mm-oom-fix-uninitialized-ret-in-task_will_free_mem
+++ a/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -764,7 +764,7 @@ bool task_will_free_mem(struct task_stru
 {
 	struct mm_struct *mm = task->mm;
 	struct task_struct *p;
-	bool ret;
+	bool ret = true;
 
 	/*
 	 * Skip tasks without mm because it might have passed its exit_mm and
_
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux