The patch titled
Subject: befs: check return of sb_min_blocksize
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
befs-check-return-of-sb_min_blocksize.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
------------------------------------------------------
From: Luis de Bethencourt <luisbg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: befs: check return of sb_min_blocksize
Confirm sb_min_blocksize() succeeded before continuing.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465700235-22881-1-git-send-email-luisbg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Luis de Bethencourt <luisbg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/befs/linuxvfs.c | 7 ++++++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff -puN fs/befs/linuxvfs.c~befs-check-return-of-sb_min_blocksize fs/befs/linuxvfs.c
--- a/fs/befs/linuxvfs.c~befs-check-return-of-sb_min_blocksize
+++ a/fs/befs/linuxvfs.c
@@ -756,6 +756,7 @@ befs_fill_super(struct super_block *sb,
long ret = -EINVAL;
const unsigned long sb_block = 0;
const off_t x86_sb_off = 512;
+ int blocksize;
save_mount_options(sb, data);
@@ -788,7 +789,11 @@ befs_fill_super(struct super_block *sb,
* least 1k to get the second 512 bytes of the volume.
* -WD 10-26-01
*/
- sb_min_blocksize(sb, 1024);
+ blocksize = sb_min_blocksize(sb, 1024);
+ if (!blocksize) {
+ befs_error(sb, "unable to set blocksize");
+ goto unacquire_priv_sbp;
+ }
if (!(bh = sb_bread(sb, sb_block))) {
if (!silent)
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from luisbg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx are
dynamic_debug-only-add-header-when-used.patch
dynamic_debug-only-add-header-when-used-fix.patch
maintainers-befs-add-new-maintainers.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
