[merged] mm-bail-out-in-shrin_inactive_list.patch removed from -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The patch titled
     Subject: mm: bail out in shrink_inactive_list()
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     mm-bail-out-in-shrin_inactive_list.patch

This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree

------------------------------------------------------
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: mm: bail out in shrink_inactive_list()

With node-lru, if there are enough reclaimable pages in highmem
but nothing in lowmem, VM can try to shrink inactive list although
the requested zone is lowmem.

The problem is that if the inactive list is full of highmem pages then a
direct reclaimer searching for a lowmem page waste CPU scanning uselessly.
It just burns out CPU.  Even, many direct reclaimers are stalled by
too_many_isolated if lots of parallel reclaimer are going on although
there are no reclaimable memory in inactive list.

I tried the experiment 4 times in 32bit 2G 8 CPU KVM machine to get
elapsed time.

	hackbench 500 process 2

= Old =

1st: 289s 2nd: 310s 3rd: 112s 4th: 272s

= Now =

1st: 31s  2nd: 132s 3rd: 162s 4th: 50s.

[akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx: fixes per Mel]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1469433119-1543-1-git-send-email-minchan@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 mm/vmscan.c |   27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)

diff -puN mm/vmscan.c~mm-bail-out-in-shrin_inactive_list mm/vmscan.c
--- a/mm/vmscan.c~mm-bail-out-in-shrin_inactive_list
+++ a/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -1652,6 +1652,30 @@ static int current_may_throttle(void)
 		bdi_write_congested(current->backing_dev_info);
 }
 
+static bool inactive_reclaimable_pages(struct lruvec *lruvec,
+				struct scan_control *sc, enum lru_list lru)
+{
+	int zid;
+	struct zone *zone;
+	int file = is_file_lru(lru);
+	struct pglist_data *pgdat = lruvec_pgdat(lruvec);
+
+	if (!global_reclaim(sc))
+		return true;
+
+	for (zid = sc->reclaim_idx; zid >= 0; zid--) {
+		zone = &pgdat->node_zones[zid];
+		if (!populated_zone(zone))
+			continue;
+
+		if (zone_page_state_snapshot(zone, NR_ZONE_LRU_BASE +
+				LRU_FILE * file) >= SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX)
+			return true;
+	}
+
+	return false;
+}
+
 /*
  * shrink_inactive_list() is a helper for shrink_node().  It returns the number
  * of reclaimed pages
@@ -1674,6 +1698,9 @@ shrink_inactive_list(unsigned long nr_to
 	struct pglist_data *pgdat = lruvec_pgdat(lruvec);
 	struct zone_reclaim_stat *reclaim_stat = &lruvec->reclaim_stat;
 
+	if (!inactive_reclaimable_pages(lruvec, sc, lru))
+		return 0;
+
 	while (unlikely(too_many_isolated(pgdat, file, sc))) {
 		congestion_wait(BLK_RW_ASYNC, HZ/10);
 
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from minchan@xxxxxxxxxx are


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux