The patch titled
Subject: include/linux/memblock.h: clean up code for several trivial details
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
include-linux-memblockh-clean-up-code-for-several-trivial-details.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
------------------------------------------------------
From: Chen Gang <chengang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: include/linux/memblock.h: clean up code for several trivial details
Correct the function parameters alignment, since original code already use
both tabs and white spaces together for the incorrect parameters alignment
functions.
If one line can hold one statement within 80 columns, let it in one line
(original code did not consider about the tabs/spaces for 2nd line when a
statement is separated into 2 lines).
Try to let '' aligned within one macro, since all related lines are
short enough.
Remove useless statement "idx = 0;", and always assign rgn within the
'for' statement.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464904899-1714-1-git-send-email-chengang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/memblock.h | 20 +++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff -puN include/linux/memblock.h~include-linux-memblockh-clean-up-code-for-several-trivial-details include/linux/memblock.h
--- a/include/linux/memblock.h~include-linux-memblockh-clean-up-code-for-several-trivial-details
+++ a/include/linux/memblock.h
@@ -73,8 +73,8 @@ extern bool movable_node_enabled;
if (memblock_debug) printk(KERN_INFO pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
phys_addr_t memblock_find_in_range_node(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align,
- phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end,
- int nid, ulong flags);
+ phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end,
+ int nid, ulong flags);
phys_addr_t memblock_find_in_range(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end,
phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align);
phys_addr_t get_allocated_memblock_reserved_regions_info(phys_addr_t *addr);
@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ void __next_mem_range_rev(u64 *idx, int
phys_addr_t *out_end, int *out_nid);
void __next_reserved_mem_region(u64 *idx, phys_addr_t *out_start,
- phys_addr_t *out_end);
+ phys_addr_t *out_end);
/**
* for_each_mem_range - iterate through memblock areas from type_a and not
@@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ void __next_reserved_mem_region(u64 *idx
p_start, p_end, p_nid) \
for (i = (u64)ULLONG_MAX, \
__next_mem_range_rev(&i, nid, flags, type_a, type_b,\
- p_start, p_end, p_nid); \
+ p_start, p_end, p_nid); \
i != (u64)ULLONG_MAX; \
__next_mem_range_rev(&i, nid, flags, type_a, type_b, \
p_start, p_end, p_nid))
@@ -163,8 +163,7 @@ void __next_reserved_mem_region(u64 *idx
* is initialized.
*/
#define for_each_reserved_mem_region(i, p_start, p_end) \
- for (i = 0UL, \
- __next_reserved_mem_region(&i, p_start, p_end); \
+ for (i = 0UL, __next_reserved_mem_region(&i, p_start, p_end); \
i != (u64)ULLONG_MAX; \
__next_reserved_mem_region(&i, p_start, p_end))
@@ -403,15 +402,14 @@ static inline unsigned long memblock_reg
}
#define for_each_memblock(memblock_type, region) \
- for (region = memblock.memblock_type.regions; \
+ for (region = memblock.memblock_type.regions; \
region < (memblock.memblock_type.regions + memblock.memblock_type.cnt); \
region++)
#define for_each_memblock_type(memblock_type, rgn) \
- idx = 0; \
- rgn = &memblock_type->regions[idx]; \
- for (idx = 0; idx < memblock_type->cnt; \
- idx++,rgn = &memblock_type->regions[idx])
+ for (idx = 0, rgn = &memblock_type->regions[0]; \
+ idx < memblock_type->cnt; \
+ idx++, rgn = &memblock_type->regions[idx])
#ifdef CONFIG_MEMTEST
extern void early_memtest(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end);
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from chengang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx are
include-mman-use-bool-instead-of-int-for-the-return-value-of-arch_validate_prot.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
