The patch titled
Subject: mm/slab: factor out kmem_cache_node initialization code
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
mm-slab-factor-out-kmem_cache_node-initialization-code.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
------------------------------------------------------
From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@xxxxxxx>
Subject: mm/slab: factor out kmem_cache_node initialization code
It can be reused on other place, so factor out it. Following patch will
use it.
Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@xxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/slab.c | 74 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
diff -puN mm/slab.c~mm-slab-factor-out-kmem_cache_node-initialization-code mm/slab.c
--- a/mm/slab.c~mm-slab-factor-out-kmem_cache_node-initialization-code
+++ a/mm/slab.c
@@ -848,6 +848,46 @@ static inline gfp_t gfp_exact_node(gfp_t
}
#endif
+static int init_cache_node(struct kmem_cache *cachep, int node, gfp_t gfp)
+{
+ struct kmem_cache_node *n;
+
+ /*
+ * Set up the kmem_cache_node for cpu before we can
+ * begin anything. Make sure some other cpu on this
+ * node has not already allocated this
+ */
+ n = get_node(cachep, node);
+ if (n) {
+ spin_lock_irq(&n->list_lock);
+ n->free_limit = (1 + nr_cpus_node(node)) * cachep->batchcount +
+ cachep->num;
+ spin_unlock_irq(&n->list_lock);
+
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ n = kmalloc_node(sizeof(struct kmem_cache_node), gfp, node);
+ if (!n)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ kmem_cache_node_init(n);
+ n->next_reap = jiffies + REAPTIMEOUT_NODE +
+ ((unsigned long)cachep) % REAPTIMEOUT_NODE;
+
+ n->free_limit =
+ (1 + nr_cpus_node(node)) * cachep->batchcount + cachep->num;
+
+ /*
+ * The kmem_cache_nodes don't come and go as CPUs
+ * come and go. slab_mutex is sufficient
+ * protection here.
+ */
+ cachep->node[node] = n;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
/*
* Allocates and initializes node for a node on each slab cache, used for
* either memory or cpu hotplug. If memory is being hot-added, the kmem_cache_node
@@ -859,39 +899,15 @@ static inline gfp_t gfp_exact_node(gfp_t
*/
static int init_cache_node_node(int node)
{
+ int ret;
struct kmem_cache *cachep;
- struct kmem_cache_node *n;
- const size_t memsize = sizeof(struct kmem_cache_node);
list_for_each_entry(cachep, &slab_caches, list) {
- /*
- * Set up the kmem_cache_node for cpu before we can
- * begin anything. Make sure some other cpu on this
- * node has not already allocated this
- */
- n = get_node(cachep, node);
- if (!n) {
- n = kmalloc_node(memsize, GFP_KERNEL, node);
- if (!n)
- return -ENOMEM;
- kmem_cache_node_init(n);
- n->next_reap = jiffies + REAPTIMEOUT_NODE +
- ((unsigned long)cachep) % REAPTIMEOUT_NODE;
-
- /*
- * The kmem_cache_nodes don't come and go as CPUs
- * come and go. slab_mutex is sufficient
- * protection here.
- */
- cachep->node[node] = n;
- }
-
- spin_lock_irq(&n->list_lock);
- n->free_limit =
- (1 + nr_cpus_node(node)) *
- cachep->batchcount + cachep->num;
- spin_unlock_irq(&n->list_lock);
+ ret = init_cache_node(cachep, node, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
}
+
return 0;
}
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from iamjoonsoo.kim@xxxxxxx are
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
