The patch titled
ipmi: don't start kipmid if the IPMI driver can use interrupts
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename is
ipmi-dont-start-kipmid-if-the-ipmi-driver-can-use-interrupts.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
------------------------------------------------------
Subject: ipmi: don't start kipmid if the IPMI driver can use interrupts
From: Corey Minyard <minyard@xxxxxxx>
If the driver has interrupts available to it, there is really no reason to
have a kernel daemon push the IPMI state machine.
Note that I have experienced machines where the interrupts do not work
correctly. This was a long time ago and hopefully things are better now.
If some machines still have broken interrupts, a blacklist will need to be
added.
Signed-off-by: Corey Minyard <minyard@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff -puN drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c~ipmi-dont-start-kipmid-if-the-ipmi-driver-can-use-interrupts drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c
--- a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c~ipmi-dont-start-kipmid-if-the-ipmi-driver-can-use-interrupts
+++ a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c
@@ -916,7 +916,11 @@ static int smi_start_processing(void
new_smi->last_timeout_jiffies = jiffies;
mod_timer(&new_smi->si_timer, jiffies + SI_TIMEOUT_JIFFIES);
- if (new_smi->si_type != SI_BT) {
+ /*
+ * The BT interface is efficient enough to not need a thread,
+ * and there is no need for a thread if we have interrupts.
+ */
+ if ((new_smi->si_type != SI_BT) && (!new_smi->irq)) {
new_smi->thread = kthread_run(ipmi_thread, new_smi,
"kipmi%d", new_smi->intf_num);
if (IS_ERR(new_smi->thread)) {
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from minyard@xxxxxxx are
origin.patch
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
