The patch titled
Subject: btrfs: use radix_tree_iter_retry()
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
btrfs-use-radix_tree_iter_retry.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
------------------------------------------------------
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: btrfs: use radix_tree_iter_retry()
Even though this is a 'can't happen' situation, use the new
radix_tree_iter_retry() pattern to eliminate a goto.
[akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx: fix btrfs build]
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Chris Mason <clm@xxxxxx>
Cc: Josef Bacik <jbacik@xxxxxx>
Cc: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/btrfs/tests/btrfs-tests.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff -puN fs/btrfs/tests/btrfs-tests.c~btrfs-use-radix_tree_iter_retry fs/btrfs/tests/btrfs-tests.c
--- a/fs/btrfs/tests/btrfs-tests.c~btrfs-use-radix_tree_iter_retry
+++ a/fs/btrfs/tests/btrfs-tests.c
@@ -137,7 +137,6 @@ static void btrfs_free_dummy_fs_info(str
void **slot;
spin_lock(&fs_info->buffer_lock);
-restart:
radix_tree_for_each_slot(slot, &fs_info->buffer_radix, &iter, 0) {
struct extent_buffer *eb;
@@ -147,7 +146,7 @@ restart:
/* Shouldn't happen but that kind of thinking creates CVE's */
if (radix_tree_exception(eb)) {
if (radix_tree_deref_retry(eb))
- goto restart;
+ slot = radix_tree_iter_retry(&iter);
continue;
}
spin_unlock(&fs_info->buffer_lock);
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx are
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
