The patch titled
Subject: init/main.c: use list_for_each_entry()
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
init-mainc-use-list_for_each_entry.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
------------------------------------------------------
From: Geliang Tang <geliangtang@xxxxxxx>
Subject: init/main.c: use list_for_each_entry()
Use list_for_each_entry() instead of list_for_each() to simplify the code.
Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliangtang@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
init/main.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff -puN init/main.c~init-mainc-use-list_for_each_entry init/main.c
--- a/init/main.c~init-mainc-use-list_for_each_entry
+++ a/init/main.c
@@ -719,7 +719,6 @@ static int __init initcall_blacklist(cha
static bool __init_or_module initcall_blacklisted(initcall_t fn)
{
- struct list_head *tmp;
struct blacklist_entry *entry;
char *fn_name;
@@ -727,8 +726,7 @@ static bool __init_or_module initcall_bl
if (!fn_name)
return false;
- list_for_each(tmp, &blacklisted_initcalls) {
- entry = list_entry(tmp, struct blacklist_entry, next);
+ list_for_each_entry(entry, &blacklisted_initcalls, next) {
if (!strcmp(fn_name, entry->buf)) {
pr_debug("initcall %s blacklisted\n", fn_name);
kfree(fn_name);
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from geliangtang@xxxxxxx are
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
