+ memremap-check-pfn-validity-before-passing-to-pfn_to_page.patch added to -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The patch titled
     Subject: memremap: check pfn validity before passing to pfn_to_page()
has been added to the -mm tree.  Its filename is
     memremap-check-pfn-validity-before-passing-to-pfn_to_page.patch

This patch should soon appear at
    http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/memremap-check-pfn-validity-before-passing-to-pfn_to_page.patch
and later at
    http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/memremap-check-pfn-validity-before-passing-to-pfn_to_page.patch

Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
   a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
   b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
   c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
      reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's

*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***

The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
there every 3-4 working days

------------------------------------------------------
From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: memremap: check pfn validity before passing to pfn_to_page()

In memremap's helper function try_ram_remap(), we dereference a struct
page pointer that was derived from a PFN that is known to be covered by a
'System RAM' iomem region, and is thus assumed to be a 'valid' PFN, i.e.,
a PFN that has a struct page associated with it and is covered by the
kernel direct mapping.

However, the assumption that there is a 1:1 relation between the System RAM
iomem region and the kernel direct mapping is not universally valid on all
architectures, and on ARM and arm64, 'System RAM' may include regions for
which pfn_valid() returns false.

Generally speaking, both __va() and pfn_to_page() should only ever be
called on PFNs/physical addresses for which pfn_valid() returns true, so
add that check to try_ram_remap().

Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 kernel/memremap.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff -puN kernel/memremap.c~memremap-check-pfn-validity-before-passing-to-pfn_to_page kernel/memremap.c
--- a/kernel/memremap.c~memremap-check-pfn-validity-before-passing-to-pfn_to_page
+++ a/kernel/memremap.c
@@ -29,10 +29,10 @@ __weak void __iomem *ioremap_cache(resou
 
 static void *try_ram_remap(resource_size_t offset, size_t size)
 {
-	struct page *page = pfn_to_page(offset >> PAGE_SHIFT);
+	unsigned long pfn = PHYS_PFN(offset);
 
 	/* In the simple case just return the existing linear address */
-	if (!PageHighMem(page))
+	if (pfn_valid(pfn) && !PageHighMem(pfn_to_page(pfn)))
 		return __va(offset);
 	return NULL; /* fallback to ioremap_cache */
 }
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxxx are

memremap-check-pfn-validity-before-passing-to-pfn_to_page.patch
x86-kallsyms-disable-absolute-percpu-symbols-on-smp.patch
x86-kallsyms-disable-absolute-percpu-symbols-on-smp-v5.patch
kallsyms-dont-overload-absolute-symbol-type-for-percpu-symbols.patch
kallsyms-add-support-for-relative-offsets-in-kallsyms-address-table.patch
kallsyms-add-support-for-relative-offsets-in-kallsyms-address-table-v5.patch

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies FAQ]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux