- oom-dont-kill-current-when-another-oom-in-progress.patch removed from -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The patch titled

     oom: don't kill current when another OOM in progress

has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename is

     oom-dont-kill-current-when-another-oom-in-progress.patch

This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree

------------------------------------------------------
Subject: oom: don't kill current when another OOM in progress
From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxx>

A previous patch to allow an exiting task to OOM kill itself (and thereby
avoid a little deadlock) introduced a problem.  We don't want the
PF_EXITING task, even if it is 'current', to access mem reserves if there
is already a TIF_MEMDIE process in the system sucking up reserves.

Also make the commenting a little bit clearer, and note that our current
scheme of effectively single threading the OOM killer is not itself
perfect.

Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>
---

 mm/oom_kill.c |   23 +++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff -puN mm/oom_kill.c~oom-dont-kill-current-when-another-oom-in-progress mm/oom_kill.c
--- a/mm/oom_kill.c~oom-dont-kill-current-when-another-oom-in-progress
+++ a/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -216,6 +216,18 @@ static struct task_struct *select_bad_pr
 			continue;
 
 		/*
+		 * This task already has access to memory reserves and is
+		 * being killed. Don't allow any other task access to the
+		 * memory reserve.
+		 *
+		 * Note: this may have a chance of deadlock if it gets
+		 * blocked waiting for another task which itself is waiting
+		 * for memory. Is there a better alternative?
+		 */
+		if (test_tsk_thread_flag(p, TIF_MEMDIE))
+			return ERR_PTR(-1UL);
+
+		/*
 		 * This is in the process of releasing memory so wait for it
 		 * to finish before killing some other task by mistake.
 		 *
@@ -223,16 +235,15 @@ static struct task_struct *select_bad_pr
 		 * go ahead if it is exiting: this will simply set TIF_MEMDIE,
 		 * which will allow it to gain access to memory reserves in
 		 * the process of exiting and releasing its resources.
-		 * Otherwise we could get an OOM deadlock.
+		 * Otherwise we could get an easy OOM deadlock.
 		 */
-		if ((p->flags & PF_EXITING) && p == current) {
+		if (p->flags & PF_EXITING) {
+			if (p != current)
+				return ERR_PTR(-1UL);
+
 			chosen = p;
 			*ppoints = ULONG_MAX;
-			break;
 		}
-		if ((p->flags & PF_EXITING) ||
-				test_tsk_thread_flag(p, TIF_MEMDIE))
-			return ERR_PTR(-1UL);
 
 		if (p->oomkilladj == OOM_DISABLE)
 			continue;
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from npiggin@xxxxxxx are

origin.patch
git-block.patch
mm-micro-optimise-zone_watermark_ok.patch
radix-tree-rcu-lockless-readside.patch
sched-force-sbin-init-off-isolated-cpus.patch

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies FAQ]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux