- pass-a-lock-expression-to-__cond_lock-like-__acquire-and.patch removed from -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The patch titled

     Pass a lock expression to __cond_lock, like __acquire and __release

has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename is

     pass-a-lock-expression-to-__cond_lock-like-__acquire-and.patch

This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree

------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Pass a lock expression to __cond_lock, like __acquire and __release
From: Josh Triplett <josht@xxxxxxxxxx>

Currently, __acquire and __release take a lock expression, but __cond_lock
takes only a condition, not the lock acquired if the expression evaluates
to true.  Change __cond_lock to accept a lock expression, and change all
the callers to pass in a lock expression.

Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>
---

 include/linux/compiler.h |    4 ++--
 include/linux/spinlock.h |   10 +++++-----
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff -puN include/linux/compiler.h~pass-a-lock-expression-to-__cond_lock-like-__acquire-and include/linux/compiler.h
--- a/include/linux/compiler.h~pass-a-lock-expression-to-__cond_lock-like-__acquire-and
+++ a/include/linux/compiler.h
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
 # define __releases(x)	__attribute__((context(1,0)))
 # define __acquire(x)	__context__(1)
 # define __release(x)	__context__(-1)
-# define __cond_lock(x)	((x) ? ({ __context__(1); 1; }) : 0)
+# define __cond_lock(x,c)	((c) ? ({ __acquire(x); 1; }) : 0)
 extern void __chk_user_ptr(void __user *);
 extern void __chk_io_ptr(void __iomem *);
 #else
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ extern void __chk_io_ptr(void __iomem *)
 # define __releases(x)
 # define __acquire(x) (void)0
 # define __release(x) (void)0
-# define __cond_lock(x) (x)
+# define __cond_lock(x,c) (c)
 #endif
 
 #ifdef __KERNEL__
diff -puN include/linux/spinlock.h~pass-a-lock-expression-to-__cond_lock-like-__acquire-and include/linux/spinlock.h
--- a/include/linux/spinlock.h~pass-a-lock-expression-to-__cond_lock-like-__acquire-and
+++ a/include/linux/spinlock.h
@@ -167,9 +167,9 @@ do {								\
  * regardless of whether CONFIG_SMP or CONFIG_PREEMPT are set. The various
  * methods are defined as nops in the case they are not required.
  */
-#define spin_trylock(lock)		__cond_lock(_spin_trylock(lock))
-#define read_trylock(lock)		__cond_lock(_read_trylock(lock))
-#define write_trylock(lock)		__cond_lock(_write_trylock(lock))
+#define spin_trylock(lock)		__cond_lock(lock, _spin_trylock(lock))
+#define read_trylock(lock)		__cond_lock(lock, _read_trylock(lock))
+#define write_trylock(lock)		__cond_lock(lock, _write_trylock(lock))
 
 #define spin_lock(lock)			_spin_lock(lock)
 
@@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ do {								\
 					_write_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags)
 #define write_unlock_bh(lock)		_write_unlock_bh(lock)
 
-#define spin_trylock_bh(lock)		__cond_lock(_spin_trylock_bh(lock))
+#define spin_trylock_bh(lock)	__cond_lock(lock, _spin_trylock_bh(lock))
 
 #define spin_trylock_irq(lock) \
 ({ \
@@ -264,7 +264,7 @@ do {								\
  */
 extern int _atomic_dec_and_lock(atomic_t *atomic, spinlock_t *lock);
 #define atomic_dec_and_lock(atomic, lock) \
-		__cond_lock(_atomic_dec_and_lock(atomic, lock))
+		__cond_lock(lock, _atomic_dec_and_lock(atomic, lock))
 
 /**
  * spin_can_lock - would spin_trylock() succeed?
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from josht@xxxxxxxxxx are

origin.patch
pass-sparse-the-lock-expression-given-to-lock-annotations.patch
nfsd-add-lock-annotations-to-e_start-and-e_stop.patch
srcu-3-rcu-variant-permitting-read-side-blocking-srcu-add-lock-annotations.patch
rcu-add-module_author-to-rcutorture-module.patch
rcu-fix-incorrect-description-of-default-for-rcutorture.patch
rcu-mention-rcu_bh-in-description-of-rcutortures.patch
rcu-avoid-kthread_stop-on-invalid-pointer-if-rcutorture.patch
rcu-fix-sign-bug-making-rcu_random-always-return-the-same.patch
rcu-add-fake-writers-to-rcutorture.patch
rcu-add-fake-writers-to-rcutorture-tidy.patch
rcu-refactor-srcu_torture_deferred_free-to-work-for.patch
rcu-add-rcu_sync-torture-type-to-rcutorture.patch
rcu-add-rcu_bh_sync-torture-type-to-rcutorture.patch
rcu-add-sched-torture-type-to-rcutorture.patch
rcu-credits-and-maintainers.patch

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies FAQ]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux