The patch titled
Make spinlock/rwlock annotations more accurate by using parameters, not types
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename is
make-spinlock-rwlock-annotations-more-accurate-by-using.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Make spinlock/rwlock annotations more accurate by using parameters, not types
From: Josh Triplett <josht@xxxxxxxxxx>
The lock annotations used on spinlocks and rwlocks currently use
__{acquires,releases}(spinlock_t) and __{acquires,releases}(rwlock_t),
respectively. This loses the information of which lock actually got
acquired or released, and assumes a different type for the parameter of
__acquires and __releases than the rest of the kernel. While the current
implementations of __acquires and __releases throw away their argument,
this will not always remain the case. Change this to use the lock
parameter instead, to preserve this information and increase consistency in
usage of __acquires and __releases.
Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h | 50 ++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff -puN include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h~make-spinlock-rwlock-annotations-more-accurate-by-using include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h
--- a/include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h~make-spinlock-rwlock-annotations-more-accurate-by-using
+++ a/include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h
@@ -19,41 +19,41 @@ int in_lock_functions(unsigned long addr
#define assert_spin_locked(x) BUG_ON(!spin_is_locked(x))
-void __lockfunc _spin_lock(spinlock_t *lock) __acquires(spinlock_t);
+void __lockfunc _spin_lock(spinlock_t *lock) __acquires(lock);
void __lockfunc _spin_lock_nested(spinlock_t *lock, int subclass)
- __acquires(spinlock_t);
-void __lockfunc _read_lock(rwlock_t *lock) __acquires(rwlock_t);
-void __lockfunc _write_lock(rwlock_t *lock) __acquires(rwlock_t);
-void __lockfunc _spin_lock_bh(spinlock_t *lock) __acquires(spinlock_t);
-void __lockfunc _read_lock_bh(rwlock_t *lock) __acquires(rwlock_t);
-void __lockfunc _write_lock_bh(rwlock_t *lock) __acquires(rwlock_t);
-void __lockfunc _spin_lock_irq(spinlock_t *lock) __acquires(spinlock_t);
-void __lockfunc _read_lock_irq(rwlock_t *lock) __acquires(rwlock_t);
-void __lockfunc _write_lock_irq(rwlock_t *lock) __acquires(rwlock_t);
+ __acquires(lock);
+void __lockfunc _read_lock(rwlock_t *lock) __acquires(lock);
+void __lockfunc _write_lock(rwlock_t *lock) __acquires(lock);
+void __lockfunc _spin_lock_bh(spinlock_t *lock) __acquires(lock);
+void __lockfunc _read_lock_bh(rwlock_t *lock) __acquires(lock);
+void __lockfunc _write_lock_bh(rwlock_t *lock) __acquires(lock);
+void __lockfunc _spin_lock_irq(spinlock_t *lock) __acquires(lock);
+void __lockfunc _read_lock_irq(rwlock_t *lock) __acquires(lock);
+void __lockfunc _write_lock_irq(rwlock_t *lock) __acquires(lock);
unsigned long __lockfunc _spin_lock_irqsave(spinlock_t *lock)
- __acquires(spinlock_t);
+ __acquires(lock);
unsigned long __lockfunc _read_lock_irqsave(rwlock_t *lock)
- __acquires(rwlock_t);
+ __acquires(lock);
unsigned long __lockfunc _write_lock_irqsave(rwlock_t *lock)
- __acquires(rwlock_t);
+ __acquires(lock);
int __lockfunc _spin_trylock(spinlock_t *lock);
int __lockfunc _read_trylock(rwlock_t *lock);
int __lockfunc _write_trylock(rwlock_t *lock);
int __lockfunc _spin_trylock_bh(spinlock_t *lock);
-void __lockfunc _spin_unlock(spinlock_t *lock) __releases(spinlock_t);
-void __lockfunc _read_unlock(rwlock_t *lock) __releases(rwlock_t);
-void __lockfunc _write_unlock(rwlock_t *lock) __releases(rwlock_t);
-void __lockfunc _spin_unlock_bh(spinlock_t *lock) __releases(spinlock_t);
-void __lockfunc _read_unlock_bh(rwlock_t *lock) __releases(rwlock_t);
-void __lockfunc _write_unlock_bh(rwlock_t *lock) __releases(rwlock_t);
-void __lockfunc _spin_unlock_irq(spinlock_t *lock) __releases(spinlock_t);
-void __lockfunc _read_unlock_irq(rwlock_t *lock) __releases(rwlock_t);
-void __lockfunc _write_unlock_irq(rwlock_t *lock) __releases(rwlock_t);
+void __lockfunc _spin_unlock(spinlock_t *lock) __releases(lock);
+void __lockfunc _read_unlock(rwlock_t *lock) __releases(lock);
+void __lockfunc _write_unlock(rwlock_t *lock) __releases(lock);
+void __lockfunc _spin_unlock_bh(spinlock_t *lock) __releases(lock);
+void __lockfunc _read_unlock_bh(rwlock_t *lock) __releases(lock);
+void __lockfunc _write_unlock_bh(rwlock_t *lock) __releases(lock);
+void __lockfunc _spin_unlock_irq(spinlock_t *lock) __releases(lock);
+void __lockfunc _read_unlock_irq(rwlock_t *lock) __releases(lock);
+void __lockfunc _write_unlock_irq(rwlock_t *lock) __releases(lock);
void __lockfunc _spin_unlock_irqrestore(spinlock_t *lock, unsigned long flags)
- __releases(spinlock_t);
+ __releases(lock);
void __lockfunc _read_unlock_irqrestore(rwlock_t *lock, unsigned long flags)
- __releases(rwlock_t);
+ __releases(lock);
void __lockfunc _write_unlock_irqrestore(rwlock_t *lock, unsigned long flags)
- __releases(rwlock_t);
+ __releases(lock);
#endif /* __LINUX_SPINLOCK_API_SMP_H */
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from josht@xxxxxxxxxx are
origin.patch
pass-sparse-the-lock-expression-given-to-lock-annotations.patch
nfsd-add-lock-annotations-to-e_start-and-e_stop.patch
srcu-3-rcu-variant-permitting-read-side-blocking-srcu-add-lock-annotations.patch
rcu-add-module_author-to-rcutorture-module.patch
rcu-fix-incorrect-description-of-default-for-rcutorture.patch
rcu-mention-rcu_bh-in-description-of-rcutortures.patch
rcu-avoid-kthread_stop-on-invalid-pointer-if-rcutorture.patch
rcu-fix-sign-bug-making-rcu_random-always-return-the-same.patch
rcu-add-fake-writers-to-rcutorture.patch
rcu-add-fake-writers-to-rcutorture-tidy.patch
rcu-refactor-srcu_torture_deferred_free-to-work-for.patch
rcu-add-rcu_sync-torture-type-to-rcutorture.patch
rcu-add-rcu_bh_sync-torture-type-to-rcutorture.patch
rcu-add-sched-torture-type-to-rcutorture.patch
rcu-credits-and-maintainers.patch
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
