The patch titled
Subject: sh64: fix __NR_fgetxattr
has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
sh64-fix-__nr_fgetxattr.patch
This patch should soon appear at
http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/sh64-fix-__nr_fgetxattr.patch
and later at
http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/sh64-fix-__nr_fgetxattr.patch
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
there every 3-4 working days
------------------------------------------------------
From: "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: sh64: fix __NR_fgetxattr
According to arch/sh/kernel/syscalls_64.S and common sense, __NR_fgetxattr
has to be defined to 259, but it doesn't. Instead, it's defined to 269,
which is of course used by another syscall, __NR_sched_setaffinity in this
case.
This bug was found by strace test suite.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry V. Levin <ldv@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/sh/include/uapi/asm/unistd_64.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff -puN arch/sh/include/uapi/asm/unistd_64.h~sh64-fix-__nr_fgetxattr arch/sh/include/uapi/asm/unistd_64.h
--- a/arch/sh/include/uapi/asm/unistd_64.h~sh64-fix-__nr_fgetxattr
+++ a/arch/sh/include/uapi/asm/unistd_64.h
@@ -278,7 +278,7 @@
#define __NR_fsetxattr 256
#define __NR_getxattr 257
#define __NR_lgetxattr 258
-#define __NR_fgetxattr 269
+#define __NR_fgetxattr 259
#define __NR_listxattr 260
#define __NR_llistxattr 261
#define __NR_flistxattr 262
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from ldv@xxxxxxxxxxxx are
sh64-fix-__nr_fgetxattr.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
