+ mm-hugetlb-fix-hugepage-memory-leak-caused-by-wrong-reserve-count.patch added to -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The patch titled
     Subject: mm: hugetlb: fix hugepage memory leak caused by wrong reserve count
has been added to the -mm tree.  Its filename is
     mm-hugetlb-fix-hugepage-memory-leak-caused-by-wrong-reserve-count.patch

This patch should soon appear at
    http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/mm-hugetlb-fix-hugepage-memory-leak-caused-by-wrong-reserve-count.patch
and later at
    http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/mm-hugetlb-fix-hugepage-memory-leak-caused-by-wrong-reserve-count.patch

Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
   a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
   b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
   c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
      reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's

*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***

The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
there every 3-4 working days

------------------------------------------------------
From: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: mm: hugetlb: fix hugepage memory leak caused by wrong reserve count

When dequeue_huge_page_vma() in alloc_huge_page() fails, we fall back to
alloc_buddy_huge_page() to directly create a hugepage from the buddy allocator.
In that case, however, if alloc_buddy_huge_page() succeeds we don't decrement
h->resv_huge_pages, which means that successful hugetlb_fault() returns without
releasing the reserve count. As a result, subsequent hugetlb_fault() might fail
despite that there are still free hugepages.

This patch simply adds decrementing code on that code path.

I reproduced this problem when testing v4.3 kernel in the following situation:
- the test machine/VM is a NUMA system,
- hugepage overcommiting is enabled,
- most of hugepages are allocated and there's only one free hugepage
  which is on node 0 (for example),
- another program, which calls set_mempolicy(MPOL_BIND) to bind itself to
  node 1, tries to allocate a hugepage,
- the allocation should fail but the reserve count is still hold.

Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [3.16+]
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 mm/hugetlb.c |    5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff -puN mm/hugetlb.c~mm-hugetlb-fix-hugepage-memory-leak-caused-by-wrong-reserve-count mm/hugetlb.c
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c~mm-hugetlb-fix-hugepage-memory-leak-caused-by-wrong-reserve-count
+++ a/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -1886,7 +1886,10 @@ struct page *alloc_huge_page(struct vm_a
 		page = __alloc_buddy_huge_page_with_mpol(h, vma, addr);
 		if (!page)
 			goto out_uncharge_cgroup;
-
+		if (!avoid_reserve && vma_has_reserves(vma, gbl_chg)) {
+			SetPagePrivate(page);
+			h->resv_huge_pages--;
+		}
 		spin_lock(&hugetlb_lock);
 		list_move(&page->lru, &h->hugepage_activelist);
 		/* Fall through */
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from n-horiguchi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx are

tools-vm-page-typesc-support-kpf_idle.patch
mm-hugetlb-fix-hugepage-memory-leak-caused-by-wrong-reserve-count.patch
rmap-add-argument-to-charge-compound-page-fix.patch
mm-hwpoison-adjust-for-new-thp-refcounting.patch

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies FAQ]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux