+ ncpfs-dont-allow-negative-timeouts.patch added to -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The patch titled
     Subject: ncpfs: don't allow negative timeouts
has been added to the -mm tree.  Its filename is
     ncpfs-dont-allow-negative-timeouts.patch

This patch should soon appear at
    http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/ncpfs-dont-allow-negative-timeouts.patch
and later at
    http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/ncpfs-dont-allow-negative-timeouts.patch

Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
   a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
   b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
   c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
      reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's

*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***

The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
there every 3-4 working days

------------------------------------------------------
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: ncpfs: don't allow negative timeouts

This code causes a static checker warning because it's a user controlled
variable where we cap the upper bound but not the lower bound.  Let's
return an -EINVAL for negative timeouts.

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: Petr Vandrovec <petr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 fs/ncpfs/ioctl.c |    4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff -puN fs/ncpfs/ioctl.c~ncpfs-dont-allow-negative-timeouts fs/ncpfs/ioctl.c
--- a/fs/ncpfs/ioctl.c~ncpfs-dont-allow-negative-timeouts
+++ a/fs/ncpfs/ioctl.c
@@ -525,7 +525,9 @@ static long __ncp_ioctl(struct inode *in
 			switch (rqdata.cmd) {
 				case NCP_LOCK_EX:
 				case NCP_LOCK_SH:
-						if (rqdata.timeout == 0)
+						if (rqdata.timeout < 0)
+							return -EINVAL;
+						else if (rqdata.timeout == 0)
 							rqdata.timeout = NCP_LOCK_DEFAULT_TIMEOUT;
 						else if (rqdata.timeout > NCP_LOCK_MAX_TIMEOUT)
 							rqdata.timeout = NCP_LOCK_MAX_TIMEOUT;
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx are

ncpfs-dont-allow-negative-timeouts.patch
mm-add-tracepoint-for-scanning-pages-fix.patch

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies FAQ]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux