The patch titled
Subject: include/linux/kdev_t.h: old/new_valid_dev() can return bool
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
fs-kdev_t-old-new_valid_dev-can-be-boolean.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
------------------------------------------------------
From: Yaowei Bai <bywxiaobai@xxxxxxx>
Subject: include/linux/kdev_t.h: old/new_valid_dev() can return bool
Make old/new_valid_dev return bool due to these two particular functions
only using either one or zero as their return value.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Yaowei Bai <bywxiaobai@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/kdev_t.h | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff -puN include/linux/kdev_t.h~fs-kdev_t-old-new_valid_dev-can-be-boolean include/linux/kdev_t.h
--- a/include/linux/kdev_t.h~fs-kdev_t-old-new_valid_dev-can-be-boolean
+++ a/include/linux/kdev_t.h
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
})
/* acceptable for old filesystems */
-static inline int old_valid_dev(dev_t dev)
+static inline bool old_valid_dev(dev_t dev)
{
return MAJOR(dev) < 256 && MINOR(dev) < 256;
}
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ static inline dev_t old_decode_dev(u16 v
return MKDEV((val >> 8) & 255, val & 255);
}
-static inline int new_valid_dev(dev_t dev)
+static inline bool new_valid_dev(dev_t dev)
{
return 1;
}
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from bywxiaobai@xxxxxxx are
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
