The patch titled
Subject: mm/compaction.c: add an is_via_compact_memory() helper
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
mm-compaction-add-an-is_via_compact_memory-helper-function.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
------------------------------------------------------
From: Yaowei Bai <bywxiaobai@xxxxxxx>
Subject: mm/compaction.c: add an is_via_compact_memory() helper
Introduce is_via_compact_memory() helper indicating compacting via
/proc/sys/vm/compact_memory to improve readability.
To catch this situation in __compaction_suitable, use order as parameter
directly instead of using struct compact_control.
This patch has no functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Yaowei Bai <bywxiaobai@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/compaction.c | 26 ++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff -puN mm/compaction.c~mm-compaction-add-an-is_via_compact_memory-helper-function mm/compaction.c
--- a/mm/compaction.c~mm-compaction-add-an-is_via_compact_memory-helper-function
+++ a/mm/compaction.c
@@ -1197,6 +1197,15 @@ static isolate_migrate_t isolate_migrate
return cc->nr_migratepages ? ISOLATE_SUCCESS : ISOLATE_NONE;
}
+/*
+ * order == -1 is expected when compacting via
+ * /proc/sys/vm/compact_memory
+ */
+static inline bool is_via_compact_memory(int order)
+{
+ return order == -1;
+}
+
static int __compact_finished(struct zone *zone, struct compact_control *cc,
const int migratetype)
{
@@ -1223,11 +1232,7 @@ static int __compact_finished(struct zon
return COMPACT_COMPLETE;
}
- /*
- * order == -1 is expected when compacting via
- * /proc/sys/vm/compact_memory
- */
- if (cc->order == -1)
+ if (is_via_compact_memory(cc->order))
return COMPACT_CONTINUE;
/* Compaction run is not finished if the watermark is not met */
@@ -1290,11 +1295,7 @@ static unsigned long __compaction_suitab
int fragindex;
unsigned long watermark;
- /*
- * order == -1 is expected when compacting via
- * /proc/sys/vm/compact_memory
- */
- if (order == -1)
+ if (is_via_compact_memory(order))
return COMPACT_CONTINUE;
watermark = low_wmark_pages(zone);
@@ -1658,10 +1659,11 @@ static void __compact_pgdat(pg_data_t *p
* this makes sure we compact the whole zone regardless of
* cached scanner positions.
*/
- if (cc->order == -1)
+ if (is_via_compact_memory(cc->order))
__reset_isolation_suitable(zone);
- if (cc->order == -1 || !compaction_deferred(zone, cc->order))
+ if (is_via_compact_memory(cc->order) ||
+ !compaction_deferred(zone, cc->order))
compact_zone(zone, cc);
if (cc->order > 0) {
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from bywxiaobai@xxxxxxx are
mm-oom_kill-introduce-is_sysrq_oom-helper.patch
fs-kdev_t-remove-unused-huge_valid_dev-function.patch
fs-kdev_t-old-new_valid_dev-can-be-boolean.patch
fs-vfs-remove-unnecessary-new_valid_dev-check.patch
fs-btrfs-remove-unnecessary-new_valid_dev-check.patch
fs-exofs-remove-unnecessary-new_valid_dev-check.patch
fs-ext2-remove-unnecessary-new_valid_dev-check.patch
fs-f2fs-remove-unnecessary-new_valid_dev-check.patch
fs-hpfs-remove-unnecessary-new_valid_dev-check.patch
fs-jfs-remove-unnecessary-new_valid_dev-check.patch
fs-ncpfs-remove-unnecessary-new_valid_dev-check.patch
fs-nilfs2-remove-unnecessary-new_valid_dev-check.patch
fs-reiserfs-remove-unnecessary-new_valid_dev-check.patch
fs-stat-remove-unnecessary-new_valid_dev-check.patch
fs-ubifs-remove-unnecessary-new_valid_dev-check.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
