[to-be-updated] mm-free-swp_entry-in-madvise_free.patch removed from -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The patch titled
     Subject: mm: free swp_entry in madvise_free
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     mm-free-swp_entry-in-madvise_free.patch

This patch was dropped because an updated version will be merged

------------------------------------------------------
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: mm: free swp_entry in madvise_free

When I test below piece of code with 12 processes(ie, 512M * 12 = 6G
consume) on my (3G ram + 12 cpu + 8G swap, the madvise_free is siginficat
slower (ie, 2x times) than madvise_dontneed.

loop = 5;
mmap(512M);
while (loop--) {
        memset(512M);
        madvise(MADV_FREE or MADV_DONTNEED);
}

The reason is lots of swapin.

1) dontneed: 1,612 swapin
2) madvfree: 879,585 swapin

If we find hinted pages were already swapped out when syscall is called,
it's pointless to keep the swapped-out pages in pte.
Instead, let's free the cold page because swapin is more expensive
than (alloc page + zeroing).

With this patch, it reduced swapin from 879,585 to 1,878 so elapsed time

1) dontneed: 6.10user 233.50system 0:50.44elapsed
2) madvfree: 6.03user 401.17system 1:30.67elapsed
2) madvfree + below patch: 6.70user 339.14system 1:04.45elapsed

Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 mm/madvise.c |   26 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff -puN mm/madvise.c~mm-free-swp_entry-in-madvise_free mm/madvise.c
--- a/mm/madvise.c~mm-free-swp_entry-in-madvise_free
+++ a/mm/madvise.c
@@ -270,7 +270,9 @@ static int madvise_free_pte_range(pmd_t
 	spinlock_t *ptl;
 	pte_t *pte, ptent;
 	struct page *page;
+	swp_entry_t entry;
 	unsigned long next;
+	int nr_swap = 0;
 
 	next = pmd_addr_end(addr, end);
 	if (pmd_trans_huge(*pmd)) {
@@ -289,8 +291,22 @@ static int madvise_free_pte_range(pmd_t
 	for (; addr != end; pte++, addr += PAGE_SIZE) {
 		ptent = *pte;
 
-		if (!pte_present(ptent))
+		if (pte_none(ptent))
 			continue;
+		/*
+		 * If the pte has swp_entry, just clear page table to
+		 * prevent swap-in which is more expensive rather than
+		 * (page allocation + zeroing).
+		 */
+		if (!pte_present(ptent)) {
+			entry = pte_to_swp_entry(ptent);
+			if (non_swap_entry(entry))
+				continue;
+			nr_swap--;
+			free_swap_and_cache(entry);
+			pte_clear_not_present_full(mm, addr, pte, tlb->fullmm);
+			continue;
+		}
 
 		page = vm_normal_page(vma, addr, ptent);
 		if (!page)
@@ -330,6 +346,14 @@ static int madvise_free_pte_range(pmd_t
 		set_pte_at(mm, addr, pte, ptent);
 		tlb_remove_tlb_entry(tlb, pte, addr);
 	}
+
+	if (nr_swap) {
+		if (current->mm == mm)
+			sync_mm_rss(mm);
+
+		add_mm_counter(mm, MM_SWAPENTS, nr_swap);
+	}
+
 	arch_leave_lazy_mmu_mode();
 	pte_unmap_unlock(pte - 1, ptl);
 next:
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from minchan@xxxxxxxxxx are

x86-add-pmd_-for-thp.patch
sparc-add-pmd_-for-thp.patch
powerpc-add-pmd_-for-thp.patch
arm-add-pmd_mkclean-for-thp.patch
arm64-add-pmd_-for-thp.patch
mm-move-lazy-free-pages-to-inactive-list.patch

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies FAQ]     [Kernel Archive]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux